from Sarah Westall:
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
by Paul Joseph Watson, Summit News:
Re-education programs are failing.
Two recent polls have found that despite relentless propaganda promoting the man-made global warming narrative, climate change skepticism is growing globally.
A survey conducted by a group within the University of Chicago asked Americans whether humans were causing all or most of climate change.
by Lance D Johnson, Natural News:
The latest investigative report from the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pension Committee (HELP), finds structural design flaws in the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) that readily allow for lab leaks of aerosol viruses. The HELP committee report found a “preponderance of circumstantial evidence” that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through more than one lab leak at the WIV. The report also found evidence of vaccine development that took place long before SARS-CoV-2 was officially identified.
by Ted Butler, Silver Seek:
Hot off the press is today’s just-released world annual silver survey from the Silver Institute. As previewed a couple of months back, the Institute is reporting flat total supply (mining plus recycling) and sharply increased demand growth of 18% or 186 million oz, resulting in the highest silver deficit in modern times of 237 million oz.
https://www.silverinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/World-Silver-Survey-2023.pdf
The survey then goes on to (try to) explain that despite the axiom of the law of supply and demand that more demand than supply (by a large margin) must result in higher prices, that silver prices were lower on average over the year 2022 than the year before. The Silver Institute’s (Metals Focus’s) pithy explanation for something that should be impossible under the free law of supply and demand, namely, prices moving lower when demand is greater than supply was due to “institutional activity” in silver. Isn’t that just marvelous? I suppose “institutional activity” sounds a lot more dignified and proper than does blatant price manipulation.
from The Epoch Times:
A terminally ill Alberta woman who was removed from an organ transplant list because she wasn’t vaccinated for COVID-19 continued to be denied access to the medical procedure even after obtaining an independent medical report showing that she has natural immunity, says the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF).
from The Highwire with Del Bigtree:
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
by Rhoda Wilson, Expose News:
You have likely heard that 97% of scientists agree on human-driven climate change. The overwhelming majority of scientists take no view on the question of whether climate change is man-made, for it is beyond our present knowledge to answer.
Only 0.3% of science papers state humans are the cause of climate change. And when surveyed, only 18% of scientists believed that a large amount – or all – of additional climate change could be averted.
by Dr. Joseph Mercola, Mercola:
from The Conservative Treehouse:
In the most recent weeks, we have discovered how the FBI worked inside Twitter, Facebook and social media to control information, remove content and manipulate opinion on behalf of the U.S. government – all political. We have also learned the FBI is taking active measures to suppress information about the Hunter Biden laptop story and control any negative consequences for the Biden regime – again, political.
by Will Jones, Daily Sceptic:
“Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” observed the English historian, Lord Acton, writing to a friend in 1857. This widely-quoted aphorism should lead us to reflect on the absolute powers that the World Health Organisation is currently seeking for its Director-General (DG). The organisation has abandoned the broad, interdisciplinary vision of health based on primary care and public engagement that characterised its original mission and was expressed in the Alma-Ata Declaration of 1978. What we now see is a top-down, command-and-control approach, based on a narrow scientific base and the preferences, or prejudices, of a few major donors. This model has palpably failed to deliver in times of crisis. If the response is to strengthen the powers of command, can the organisation be trusted to use these wisely, responsibly and effectively?