by Martin Armstrong, Armstrong Economics:
Every poll imaginable shows Biden and Harris steeply declining in popularity. Biden’s favorability is now lower than the past 13 presidents. I cannot imagine any sane person supporting him after what he has done to the nation in the past three years. No one can honestly say they are better off under Biden.
This man received more votes than any other president in US history. Despite his rapidly declining poll numbers, he refuses to campaign. His handlers know that they do not need to campaign because the election results have already been decided. They want to keep him far from the public eye because he embarrasses himself at every speaking engagement.
It will mark the beginning of a new phase of accelerated progress towards the UN Sustainable Development Goals with high-level political guidance on transformative and accelerated actions leading up to Agenda 2030.
Back during the planscamdemic, I and a few others around the world, including our friend and colleague Catherine Austin Fitts, all came to certain conclusions about what was going on based on our observations of the behavior and pronouncements of “authorities”, “experts”, and the big pharma companies. Our “scenario” (making allowances for slight differences from person to person advancing different versions of it) basically went as follows: the planscamdemic was contrived for several purposes, some of them social and cultural, some economic, and some medical. The medical aspect of our speculation was that a gigantic world-wide medical experiment was being conducted on the entire human population, or at least, as much of a diverse sampling of it as was possible , without its fully informed consent. That medical experiment included the deliberate release and infection of people by pathogens which, in turn, had been deliberately modified, and those modifications were the products of bioweapons research. The other component of this vast Mengele-on-steroids operation was the “cure”: so-called vaccines were rushed to market via emergency use authorizations, use itself which had been carefully prepared by presidential declarations that allowed the terminally ill to receive experimental therapies.
Endless ink has been spilled by economists and financial analysts in their efforts to predict the impact of de-dollarization. As might be expected, most of those who embrace a US-centric view of the world and who defend the status quo paint a gloomy picture. They warn of the nightmarish consequences of a Russia- and China-dominated world order, of the threats to freedom and to human rights that this could pose and of a potential breakdown in global trade, due to lack of trust and transparency.