by Susan Duclos, All News Pipeline:
We have spoken about online censorship, social media silencing content they do not approve of, Google demonetizing websites like ANP that doesn’t follow the “authoritative, scientific consensus,” but the ‘RESTRICT act’ takes things to a whole new level.
Stefan Stanford recently described the RESTRICT act, otherwise known as Senate Bill 686, as an attempt at “controlling Internet content,” in order to ensure that the “never-ending stream of lies that we’ve been getting from the government and the mainstream media for the past several decades at least will be the ONLY information that we’re ‘allowed’ to get.”
Read Stefan’s entire piece at this link, because he has a great grasp on the damage this bill, if passed by the Senate and the House, then signed into law by Joe Biden, will do to all of our abilities to get the truth rather than the “official narrative.”
For many years, our friend and colleague Catherine Austin Fitts has been warning about something she has been calling “disaster capitalism,” the use (or creation) of crises of opportunity to bankrupt one’s opponents and to buy up their assets or property on the cheap. It was a major theme of her – and many others’ – understanding of the weird California fires, which seemed to many including this author to have been deliberately caused. The “riots” we witnessed seemed – as she pointed out – rather too oddly and “coincidentally” to follow the “opportunity zones” in which the “riots” occurred. This technique – use, or create, a crisis or disaster, then buy up the assets on the cheap – she and others have called disaster capitalism. I have another name for it, which one may ascertain by adding the letter “r” to the word “capitalism” in the headline.
There were 31% higher deaths in the vax group in the “gold standard” Phase 3 clinical trials. How do we know that none of those deaths were caused by the vaccine? Because Pfizer said so. No evidence.
