by Rhoda Wilson, Expose News:
On yesterday’s episode of Trending, Gareth Icke and Richard Willet dive into the UK Climate and Nature (“CAN”) Bill, currently sneaking its way through Parliament without scrutiny.
Very much like the WHO Pandemic Treaty, the CAN Bill would give unelected bodies sweeping powers to take over land, prevent travel, and control meat consumption, among other draconian powers, in the event of a “climate emergency.”
Icke and Willet also discussed the Los Angeles wildfires and the possible connection to the LA Smart City 2028 agenda, the BBC’s climate change propaganda, including the vilification of family pets as a cause for climate change, and the UK’s release of a new two pound coin to commemorate the life of 1984 author George Orwell. The coin features the Big Brother eye.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
In the following, we focus on Trending’s discussion of the CAN Bill.
The Climate and Nature (“CAN”) Bill has largely gone under the radar. It was reintroduced in the UK House of Commons by Liberal Democrat MP Roz Savage on 16 October 2024 and has its second reading scheduled in 9 days, on 24 January.
“The reason it’s gone under the radar is they don’t want any scrutiny of it. The reason they don’t want scrutiny of it is because it ain’t going to be very good for us,” Icke said.
The Bill is a rebadged version of the UN Agenda 2030. The Bill includes provisions for forced rewilding, which is another way of saying that the government will grant itself powers to seize land from farmers and others if they do not meet sustainable goals.
It also includes retrofitting of homes, which would require homeowners to make changes such as installing insulation, heat pumps or solar panels at their own expense.
Of course, the rules which allow the government to grab land and property or require homeowners to make changes to their homes are made by a select few using arbitrary arguments and can change at a whim.
The Bill aims to ban fossil fuels, which would lead to pressure on the energy supply and drive up prices, making energy unaffordable for some people.
The government would have control over various aspects of people’s lives, including energy use, food consumption, travel and what can be fitted or not fitted in their homes, with smart meters playing a role.
“They’ll be able to order you not to travel, not to leave certain areas, not to fly … they’ll be able to control food consumption what you’re allowed to [eat] … What will also tie into this is what you say,” Icke said. “Another thing that’s on there is energy use, so they can control how much energy you use.”
“It should also be pointed out,” said Willet, “This will all be monitored on your digital ID system. So all of this data will be collated on a digital ID system.”
Usually, a bill has two or three sponsors. The CAN Bill has over 200 sponsors in Parliament, indicating strong support for it to pass in Parliament.
The acronym “CAN” could easily be a psychological trick, so the public views the Bill with a positive connotation, even though in reality it is sinister.
The justification for the CAN Bill is to address climate change, but the reality is it gives the government power to declare emergencies, and then implement policies and control people’s behaviour in response to that emergency without public input.
Section 2 of the Bill proves the undefined, arbitrary and changeable nature of the yardsticks that the appointed enforcers will have at their disposal to invoke their powers:
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the passing of this Act, publish and lay before Parliament a strategy (“the strategy”) to achieve the objectives [of reducing its overall contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions to net zero and halting and reversing its overall contribution to the degradation and loss of nature in the United Kingdom and overseas].
(3) The strategy must include measures that … will achieve the objectives … by –
(a) limiting the United Kingdom’s total emissions of carbon dioxide to no more than its proportionate share of the remaining global carbon budget;
(c) reducing the United Kingdom’s emissions of greenhouse gases other than carbon dioxide at rates consistent with a proportionate United Kingdom contribution to limiting global heating to 1.5 degrees Celsius.
Climate and Nature Bill (As Introduced), Zero Hour
Neither the objectives nor 3(a) nor 3(c) can ever be specific, measurable or realistic, it is simply not possible even if anthropogenic climate change were real – it is all made-up nonsense, the Bill’s premise, the strategy it is attempting to legislate and any targets that are spun out from it. And there are 200 supporters for this Bill?!
