by Sayer Ji, Green Med Info:
In a long-overdue reckoning, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and a growing chorus of non-establishment health experts are shedding light on the toxic metals in water fluoridation chemicals–calling for an end to a practice that poses significant, unavoidable health risks, particularly for vulnerable populations.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Quick Summary:
- Mounting Evidence of Harm: Hundreds of studies link fluoride exposure to adverse health effects, from cognitive decline and thyroid disruption to reproductive health impacts.
- Regulatory Gaps and Government Underwriting: Like the vaccine and nuclear industries, the government underwrites liability for fluoridation, ignoring the unmitigated risk to public health.
- Hydrofluorosilicic Acid’s Toxicity: The primary fluoridating agent, hydrofluorosilicic acid, contains harmful contaminants, including arsenic, aluminum, and lead, making “safe use” impossible.
- Pioneering Research by GreenMedInfo: GreenMedInfo.com has compiled a groundbreaking research database on fluoride’s health impacts, empowering global access to the extensive evidence of harm and sparking informed debates worldwide.
The Parallel Between Fluoridation, Vaccines, and Nuclear Industries: Unavoidable Risks with Government-Underwritten Liability
Water fluoridation, like certain vaccine components and nuclear energy, operates under an implicit understanding of being “unavoidably unsafe.” This designation, used by public health and regulatory bodies, implies that some level of harm is inevitable and thus underwritten by government liability protections. For example, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act grants liability protection to vaccine manufacturers, acknowledging the potential for adverse reactions while still promoting vaccine use. Similarly, the Price-Anderson Act for the nuclear industry limits liability for nuclear accidents, given the inherent risks associated with nuclear power.1
For fluoridation, these protections take the form of regulatory standards that, while setting some thresholds, do not account for the compounding, cumulative effects of the toxic metals found in fluoride additives like hydrofluorosilicic acid (HFS). Government oversight allows municipalities to add fluoride chemicals containing arsenic, lead, and other heavy metals into public drinking water, insulating local governments from liability for the potential health impacts. This lack of accountability reflects an assumption that the benefits of fluoridation outweigh its risks–a stance increasingly questioned by scientists, health advocates, and, most recently, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.2
Hydrofluorosilicic Acid: A Source of Unregulated Toxicity in Water Fluoridation
Hydrofluorosilicic acid (HFS), the most common fluoridating agent, is a byproduct of the phosphate fertilizer industry, not pharmaceutical-grade fluoride. HFS is often contaminated with a variety of toxic metals, including arsenic and lead, which cannot be consistently removed through water treatment. According to a 2016 study by Peterson et al., even low levels of HFS in water contribute an additional 0.078 µg/L of arsenic to drinking water–a cumulative exposure risk with broad implications for community health.3
