by Sayer Ji, Green Med Info:
In a world where every post, share, and tweet can shape public opinion, the stakes of controlling digital platforms have never been higher. Recently leaked documents reveal the “Kill Musk’s Twitter” directive–an ambitious plan led by the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) that exposes a global plot to silence dissent, criminalize free speech, and manipulate election outcomes. This directive goes beyond isolated censorship; it signals a revival of “seditious libel” laws on a global scale, echoing the conditions that ignited the American Revolution in 1776. At its core, this campaign poses a direct threat to the principles of democratic society, pressing us to ask: Will we allow history to repeat itself, or will we stand against this new era of authoritarian control over public discourse?
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Quick Summary:
- The “Kill Musk’s Twitter” directive is part of a larger, transnational censorship operation aimed at enforcing a single narrative across borders, with dangerous implications for free speech and election integrity.
- CCDH’s use of BlackOps tactics against RFK Jr. and others reveals intelligence-style operations targeting dissent, bringing unprecedented election interference implications to light.
- This campaign reflects a coordinated global plot involving the U.S., U.K., and international bodies like NATO, reviving “seditious libel” laws that criminalize dissent and threaten Constitutionally protected liberties.
- Platforms like X have become the last strongholds of free speech in an increasingly censored digital world, standing as critical outposts in the battle to preserve democratic freedoms and resist a new era of globalized speech control.
Behind the Directive: More Than a Vendetta Against Musk
The CCDH’s “Kill Musk’s Twitter” directive, leaked in October 2023, may sound like a simple attempt to target Musk’s social media platform, X. But the directive is only one piece of a larger campaign that reveals a highly coordinated censorship apparatus operating across borders. At the heart of this operation lies the CCDH, with its chairman, Simon Clark, connected to the Atlantic Council–a well-known vehicle for U.S.-U.K. intelligence interests. Together, these connections suggest CCDH may act as an intermediary, or “cut-out,” designed to funnel influence between governments to control dissent.
Morgan McSweeney, a Labour Party insider working closely with the Harris campaign, is also a founding member of CCDH, bringing the operation directly into the political sphere. These ties point to a larger, organized attempt to suppress narratives that threaten the political establishment, particularly during sensitive election cycles. The Trump campaign’s recent FEC complaint, which highlights British political operatives like McSweeney meddling in US elections, further underscores the stakes of this directive.
Targeting RFK Jr.: BlackOps and the “Disinformation Dozen”
One of the most troubling revelations from the leaked Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) memo is its mention of “BlackOps” tactics aimed at maligning prominent figures like RFK Jr., a U.S. presidential candidate. The directive, initially reported on October 20 by journalists Paul Thacker and Matt Taibbi, also contained information on a leaked memo showing CCDH CEO Imran Ahmed talking about a “BlackOps” targeting RFK Jr.2 Unlike typical counter-disinformation efforts, BlackOps refers to covert, often illegal intelligence or paramilitary operations characterized by plausible deniability.
.png)
Historically, BlackOps have been associated with actions like surveillance, digital sabotage, and even assassinations, making their use in the political arena especially disturbing. For the Kennedy family–whose legacy is already scarred by politically motivated assassinations–the specter of BlackOps carries profound, dark implications.
The memo brands RFK Jr. as part of the “Disinformation Dozen,” marking him as a target for covert tactics intended not only to silence but to discredit and isolate him from public discourse. This isn’t merely about suppressing dissenting opinions; it’s a concerted effort to neutralize RFK Jr.’s voice, potentially impacting his influence on the election and public opinion. The revelation that BlackOps tactics are being directed at a U.S. presidential candidate underscores an urgent need for transparency around government-media collusion and potential foreign interference.
The violent tone in CCDH’s leaked directive–such as the order to “KILL MUSK’S TWITTER”–reveals an aggressive stance that starkly contradicts the organization’s public mission of “countering hate.” When attempting to create an image for “Kill Musk’s Twitter” to illustrate the theme of censorship and suppression, even OpenAI’s policy flagged the term as violating its safety standards. When prompted, the AI responded:
ChatGPT:
“The phrase ‘Kill Musk’s Twitter’ and related imagery suggest violent or aggressive themes, particularly when depicting attacks on a platform or specific individuals, even in a symbolic or metaphorical way. Our content policy is designed to avoid generating imagery or language that could imply harm, aggression, or targeted hostility toward individuals or entities, even within the context of information warfare or censorship discussions.”
This AI response underscores the disturbing nature of the language used in CCDH’s directive, which raises universal safety concerns across big tech platforms. If the phrase “Kill Musk’s Twitter” is considered too aggressive even in metaphorical use due to safety standards, it calls into question CCDH’s legitimacy as an organization purportedly dedicated to fighting hate. It is profoundly ironic that CCDH, a group claiming to “counter hate,” is exhibiting behaviors more consistent with a hate group–employing extreme, aggressive rhetoric and targeting individuals with what are historically dangerous tactics.
