by Joseph P. Farrell, Giza Death Star:
One would have to be either willfully deaf or dumb, or blind, not to have noticed the stories emerging that are signaling the demise of the planscamdemic narrative, and more importantly, the blowback against “global health initiatives”. In fact, this week i received not only the usual batch of news about adverse injection reactions, but four important stories that indicate that the narrative is collapsing in a way implicating the collapse of the entire globaloney “health structure”, the “international agencies” that are supposedly about protecting “global health.” We saw, for example, the attempted assassination of Slovakian premier Fico, and his own statements to the effect that he believes it was in part motivated by his country’s stance against the whole planscamdemic-injection narrative. Well, according to this story shared by W.G., you can add the Philippine House of Representatives to that list as well:
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Given the position and stature of the Philippines in that part of the world, one may expect the “trend” to spread from their to other countries (if it hasn’t already. If you’ve been watching Japan carefully, that country has become a hotbed of planscamdemic narrative “denial”).
One of the areas of blowback from the planscamdemic narrative has been the “health treaty” that the World Health Organization WHO) has been trying to implement, a treaty that would basically force nations to give up their sovereignty in the face of a declared “global health emergency”, which, of course, the WHO itself would get to declare. Indeed, the whole planscamdemic narrative – as many researchers quickly argued – showed all the hallmarks of coordinated reaction: masks, “social distancing”, lockdowns were rolled out on a global basis and not merely nationally. And that, they argued, was the surest argument that the whole thing was not mere coincidence, and a kind of “health conspiracy”. But what it now appears that the planscamdemic did – rather like the forgotten SARS episode years ago – was that it sparked a backlash. Consider this story from Oklahoma shared by S.D., and Oklahoma is not alone of the US states passing such laws nullfying any treaty that might be entered into by FedGov and Criminal Assoc., LLC:
Rep. Rick West Comments on Governor Signing Protection from WHO Mandates
Similar measures have made their way, or are making their way, through other state legislatures, with Louisiana and Florida already having similar laws. The bottom line is, the planscamdemic narrative is failing in one of its objectives, namely, to stampede the world into surrendering to a health dictatorship. One can imagine, of course, that a group of “leaders” willing to force people to take their largely untested – and now verifiably risky and in many cases deadly – injections, will not hesitate to concoct a really deadly pathogen to unleash on the world, while profering yet another “safe and effective cure”, if only everyone will submit to their global diktat. Remember, the Great Orange One actually talked publicly about getting the military involved in making sure everyone had “access” to the injections.
And speaking of the injections, you might recall that during the height of the planscamdemic, the health Tsars were literally changing the lexical definitions the term “vaccine” itself, in order to foster people’s acceptance of the more radically experimental versions of the injections, the so-called “mRNA vaccines.” Well, now the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a ruling declaring that the planscamdemic injections do not qualify as vaccines under any traditional medical definition of the term:
Breaking! COVID mRNA Jabs Are NOT Vaccines, Court Rules
Note the following from this story:
The ruling centers on a lawsuit brought by Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF) and other plaintiffs against the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) over its mandate that all employees must be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 by a specified deadline.
Circuit Judge R. Nelson wrote Friday that the mRNA shots, marketed as vaccines, do not effectively prevent the transmission of COVID-19 but only reduce symptoms in those who contract the virus, which do not make them traditional vaccines outlined in the 1905 Jacobson v. Massachusetts case…
Jacobson v. Massachusetts upheld the state’s right to enforce smallpox vaccinations due to their proven effectiveness in preventing disease spread, but the COVID-19 shots do not offer the same benefits.
Addressing the merits, the panel held that the district court misapplied the Supreme Court’s decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), in concluding that the Policy survived rational basis review. Jacobson held that mandatory vaccinations were rationally related to preventing the spread of smallpox.
Here, however, plaintiffs allege that the vaccine does not effectively prevent spread but only mitigates symptoms for the recipient and therefore is akin to a medical treatment, not a ‘traditional’ vaccine. Taking plaintiffs’ allegations as true at this stage of litigation, plaintiffs plausibly alleged that the COVID-19 vaccine does not effectively ‘prevent the spread’ of COVID-19. Thus, Jacobson does not apply.
The ruling reverses a lower court’s dismissal of the case against the LAUSD’s vaccine mandate.
I suspect that this decision will have massive and major legal repercussions, because if the planscamdemic injections do not qualify as vaccines legally, then the legal immunities afforded to pharmaceutical companies for their vaccine products may have just effectively collapsed. Or to put this differently, the 9th circuit court of appeals may have just opened the door to lawsuits against the pharmaceutical companies, and perhaps even personal suits against their corporate officers.
