by Frank Bergman, Slay News:
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has just dropped a bomb on the Covid mass vaccination agenda.
The appeals court delivered a seismic ruling on the nature of the Covid mRNA injections.
The decision could reshape public health policy across the nation.
The ruling was delivered during a contentious case involving the Health Freedom Defense Fund and other plaintiffs versus the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD).
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
While ruling on the case, the court has declared that COVID-19 mRNA injections do not qualify as vaccines under traditional medical definitions.
The case revolved around the LAUSD’s COVID-19 vaccination policy.
The policy required all employees to be fully vaccinated against Covid by a specified deadline.
The plaintiffs argued that the district’s vaccine mandate infringed upon their fundamental right to refuse medical treatment.
They argue that the mRNA shots do not prevent the transmission of Covid but merely mitigate symptoms for the recipient, at best.
The court’s opinion was written by Circuit Judge R. Nelson and supported by Judge Collins.
The judges assert that the mRNA shots, marketed as vaccines, do not effectively prevent the transmission of COVID-19.
In the opinion, the judges note that the injections do nothing more than merely reduce symptoms in those who contract the virus.
Therefore, the injections cannot be labeled as vaccines.
This crucial distinction undermines the foundational premise of the vaccine mandates enforced by various governmental and educational institutions, as the Gateway Pundit notes.
Judge Nelson pointed out that the mandate was inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s century-old ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts.
The case upheld the state’s right to enforce smallpox vaccinations due to their proven effectiveness in preventing disease spread.
In contrast, the Covid mRNA shots do not offer such public health benefits.
