by Brian Shilhavy, Health Impact News:
Much of the news in the alternative media the past few days has been very apocalyptic, suggesting that we are on the brink of an escalation of world conflicts into a nuclear conflict with Russia.
And yet, as easy as it is to cover both sides of any current geopolitical issue by simply reading the English news sites published by all countries currently involved in conflicts around the world, it seems as if few bother to do so, and simply regurgitate a narrative that is the most popular among their readers and entices the most clicks.
Is Russia really about to escalate their conflict with NATO into a full blown nuclear war?
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Not according to Russian President Vladimir Putin, who addressed the issue when he met with the heads of the world’s major news agencies in Russia yesterday, and reportedly stated:
Look, someone has imagined that Russia wants to attack NATO.
Have you gone completely insane? Are you as thick as this table? Who came up with this nonsense, this bulls**t? (Source.)
I know that most Americans will object at this point and state that Putin’s words cannot be trusted, and while I do not disagree with that, there is plenty of other evidence to look at, which I will present in this article today, to suggest that Putin is not lying when he says Russia has no desire to take on NATO.
Much of the “nuclear war” fear that has been published during the past couple of days is centered around Putin’s response to the fact that the U.S. and Europe are now openly admitting that they are supplying arms to Ukraine to be used for attacks inside of Russia.
Here is what he reportedly said yesterday on this issue:
“We are thinking about the fact that if someone considers it possible to supply such weapons to a war zone to strike at our territory and create problems for us, then why do we not have the right to supply our weapons of the same class to those regions of the world where attacks on sensitive facilities will be carried out… The answer may be asymmetric. We will think about it.” (Source.)
Notice that there was no threat of actually launching nuclear weapons, but for an “asymmetric” response, by also supplying long range missiles “to those regions of the world where attacks on sensitive facilities will be carried out,” the same as what the U.S. and NATO are currently doing in Ukraine.
Which countries might those include where Russia could send long range missiles to? Probably Iran, along with their proxies such as Hamas, Hezbollah, etc., as well as some of the former members of the Soviet Union who are not part of NATO.
Regarding their nuclear weapon policies, Putin is quoted as stating:
“We have a nuclear doctrine, look what is written. If someone’s actions threaten our sovereignty and territorial integrity, we consider it possible to use all the means at our disposal,” Putin said at a meeting with the representatives of international news agencies on the sidelines of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum.
“This is such a very tough topic. The United States is the only country that used nuclear weapons, in the Second World War — Hiroshima, Nagasaki, 20 kilotonnes. Our tactical nuclear weapons are 70-75 kilotonnes, such nuclear tactical weapons.
Let’s not to bring not only to its use, but even to the threat of use,” he added. (Source.)
What are the Chances of an Attack on the U.S. Mainland?
At this point, almost zero, in my opinion. And the biggest reason is that until our financial system crashes and the U.S. can no longer pay their financial obligations, all these countries will continue to prosper from doing business with the U.S.
And while we have sanctions in place against Russia, they have been largely symbolic, and they have further driven Russia to do more business with China, where most of their oil is exported to, for example.
China and the U.S are the largest economies in the world, and they are intertwined so closely, that any talk about a hot war between China and the U.S. will almost always just be rhetoric, as the real war between the two countries is an economic war because both countries depend upon each other so intrinsically, where China has a huge advantage when it comes to manufacturing and labor, while the U.S. has remained the stronger nation due solely to its financial system and the use of the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency, which is quickly coming to an end.
Last year (2023) we saw many of America’s billionaires go to China to court President Xi’s favor, and JP Morgan Chase bank CEO Jamie Dimon admitted that it would take at least a decade for the U.S. to “decouple” from China and our dependency on China’s exports to the U.S.
So if there is some kind of “attack” on U.S. soil seen anytime soon, please understand that the odds are greatly in favor of it being a “false flag” attack by our own government on its own citizens, but framed to be an attack by one of our alleged enemies, such as Russia, China, or Iran.
Read More @ HealthImpactNews.com
