by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D., Childrens Health Defense:
Commenting on the new app — Threads — Journalist Kim Iversen said Zuckerberg is not “socially savvy, so I don’t know if he fully understands … why [people] want a censorship-free platform.”
One day after a federal judge temporarily barred key Biden administration officials and federal agencies from communicating with social media platforms about censoring specific online content, Mark Zuckerberg launched Threads — Meta’s new social media platform intended to compete with Twitter.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
“But have no fear all, hope for censorship isn’t lost,” journalist Kim Iversen told viewers of “The Kim Iversen Show,” “because yesterday, Mark Zuckerberg‘s Twitter knockoff, Threads, was unveiled and it immediately began censoring users.”
Iversen reported the app was released with much fanfare, but she said she doubts it will become a real competitor to Twitter for several reasons.
First, she said, the user base for an app like Threads is different from that of Twitter.
Threads is based on Instagram, which is a “very visual medium,” whereas Twitter is for writers, comedians and people who prefer to communicate via written text. The two platforms serve different purposes, she said, so it isn’t clear why people would transfer from Twitter to Threads.
“I like looking at the makeup posts and the fashion and the food and the cats [on Instagram],” she said, “but I don’t know if I really want to know what they have to say on politics or current events. That’s why I go to Twitter.”
Iversen also doubted people would want to add yet another app to their social media portfolio, giving them one more thing to check each day.
But the most serious barrier to Threads’ success, she said, is that it is already censoring users.
“They immediately do the one thing that is upsetting to everybody,” she said.
Iversen said Zuckerberg is not “socially savvy, so I don’t know if he fully understands the appeal of Twitter and why people were up in arms about the censorship and why they want a censorship-free platform.”
She said she thought that Twitter holds equal appeal for both its fans and its haters.
Even people who claim they think they want censorship on social media platforms, she said, “deep down they don’t [want censorship]. They want to hear the crap that other people have to say so that they can rag on it and get mad about it.”
“Twitter feeds off of anger, it feeds off of being upset and picking on people. It’s unhealthy but that’s the emotion,” she added.
But the censorship is already happening, Iversen said, sharing a tweet from Derek Utley informing followers that Threads users alerted him that he is being censored.
.@meta /IG just released their new threads platform and I’ve been informed by multiple users that I’m censored on their new platform.
Sheesh, can’t a dude catch a break.@elonmusk doesn’t have me censored pic.twitter.com/WevfHx04qw
— Derek Utley (@realDerekUtley) July 6, 2023
Iversen said when she tried to follow Utley on Threads, “Immediately this image pops up and it says this account has been repeatedly posting false information that was reviewed by independent fact-checkers and went against our community guidelines.”
People can follow him, but potential followers first receive that warning.
Iversen said Threads is treating many other accounts, such as DC Drano and Donald Trump Jr., the same way and that all censored accounts appear to be held by Republicans.
“I don’t know of any Democrats [this happens to] because, of course, they only tell the truth,” she joked.
Threads also is collecting extensive user data. Iversen showed Twitter founder Jack Dorsey’s tweet posting all the data that Meta collects from its users, which includes health and fitness, financial data, location data, search history, contacts, purchase history and more.
Read More @ ChildrensHealthDefense.org
