by Stefan Stanford, All News Pipeline:
In this alarming story over at RT that strongly hints of escalating destruction dead ahead they report that according to a Russian Lieutenant General, the ‘biden cabal‘ has resumed its bio-weapons program in Ukraine, building secretive new facilities that’ll presumably be used to create even newer ‘COVID-19‘ bioweapons, and as Steve Quayle warned in an SQnote while linking to that story, any creation of gene specific bioweapons that directly target Russians will only hasten nukes being launched upon the USA.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
With that report interestingly coming out at a time when an alleged ‘leak‘ has allegedly ‘startled‘ the biden administration, with none other than the NY Times reporting a whole boatload of ‘top secret‘ documents related to war and Ukraine and China and have come out on the internet, with the classified documents that were ‘leaked‘ online allegedly adding ‘turmoil‘ to the biden cabal’s plans because they ‘allegedly’ contained ‘secrets‘ that they didn’t want Russia or the American people to know, we urge you to note we’ve highlighted that word ‘allegedly’ based on Sun Tzu’s legendary book “The Art of War.”
Because with one of the most famous quotes from that book being “All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near,” as the Conservative Treehouse reports of that ‘leak,’ we must look much deeper than just ‘the leak’ if we want to see the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
Reporting within their story that the fact that this story first surfaced in the NY Times tells us something huge with the NYT proven to be one of the totally controlled msm outlets spewing ‘state/communist propaganda,’ we’re also warned this story being kicked off by the NYT is designed to ‘shape opinion and a narrative with the mass domestic audience’ with a motive towards something else, giving the deep state the perfect opportunity in this case to frame a ‘Russian dis/mis/mal-information narrative.’ Are we witnessing a ‘blame Russia for the upcoming nuclear war‘ narrative being framed? From this Conservative Treehouse story before we continue.:
Now, let’s use this opportunity to expand our knowledge base, overlay the known frameworks that operate within our government, and simultaneously give a perspective that will not surface anywhere else.
First, the story surfaces from the New York Times. What does that tell us? It tells us the stakeholders in a background narrative surrounding the issue as constructed are domestic intelligence interests. If there was a State Dept stakeholder interest, the story would have been presented by CNN. If there was a U.S. foreign intelligence operation stakeholder interest, the story would have surfaced in the Washington Post.
The story surfaces in the New York Times, indicating a U.S. domestic intelligence interest; and the story is sourced directly to the White House via “senior Biden administration officials.” What does that mean? It means the narrative that flows from the story has a direction to shape opinion from the perspective of U.S. government domestic public relations. It means the narrative is intended to sway a domestic audience with a motive toward something else.
Secondly, and in full alignment with the first point, the centerpiece of the story is focused on a leak that surfaces in “social media.” This fits perfectly with the domestic intelligence stakeholders (DHS, National Security Council, etc). We know domestic intelligence operates in the backbone of social media platforms. An example is DHS and domestic Intelligence Community (IC) work as outlined in the Twitter files.
Put them together, a domestic IC product surfaced (being called leaked) into social media platforms containing portals controlled by domestic IC.
The domestic IC then report on the leaks to the outlet used by the domestic IC. See how these fit?
If you follow the bouncing ball, what you immediately suspect is the domestic IC planted the ‘classified information’ in the platforms they can access, then turn around and report on the leak of the classified information to media they use for domestic narrative engineering.
♦ Motive – But why would the IC plant classified information, then turn around and report on the classified information they planted? This is where you need to learn how the motives work, against a bigger picture.
The leak (planted information) and then the telling of the leak (NYT story) creates an opportunity for the domestic IC to frame a Russian dis/mis/mal-information narrative.
But why would the IC want to immediately stir up a misinformation or disinformation narrative against Russia?
♦ Answer: 18 hours before the leak/story construct. Two Russian gremlins, perhaps state sponsored, or perhaps just state aligned, tricked former French President Francois Hollande into admitting the U.S. government and western alliance were behind all of the events in Ukraine after 2014, with the expressed intention to construct a proxy war against Russia using Ukraine.
Russian Pranksters Vovan and Lexus, posing as former Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko, got French ex-President Francois Hollande to admit the Minsk Accords were a NATO ruse to militarize Ukraine, and Western nations overthrew Ukraine’s democratically-elected government in 2014.
Read More @ AllNewsPipeline.com
