by Dr. Steve LaTulippe, America Outloud:
Caring Americans feel sorry for some Buckeye state residents who are now doomed to live in their new toxic environment, no thanks to the utterly worthless Pete Buttigieg. Evidence suggests a safe habitat isn’t anywhere in the near future. According to independent industrial hygienist Stephen Petty, Palestine residents have good reason for concern: “In order to determine the toxicity or how to protect people, you gotta know what you’re protecting them with… but there’s a lot we don’t know yet.”
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Wait a minute. If reactions from local living organisms are any clue, living in this small Ohio town is going to be — at the very least — risky. Don’t expect to get an honest answer from Buttigieg or the Environmental Protection Agency. Joe Biden’s team has a much greater vested interest in the welfare of his golden egg layer in Ukraine than in small-town America. What can locals expect? So far, things aren’t looking so good.
According to a recent New York Post article, one long-term East Palestine resident, Jami Cozza, reports that many of his 47 extended family members are suffering health issues from the chemical fire, and also from the emotional anguish of what their future holds. Many residents describe having a sore throat, mysterious skin rashes, nausea, fatigue, and malaise. Surrounding creeks bear signs of significant water contamination somewhat resembling oil/gas spills. The consensus among the natives is, “They’re poisoning us slowly,” as Cozza lamented.
When the EPA declared the site safe on February 8, residents were by no means consoled. And for good reason. Some 43,000 animals in the area have been reported dead so far. Reporter Ben Bergquam filmed three completely intact dead deer near Little Beaver Creek, just downstream from the chemical spill site from the train derailment. The deer showed no outward signs of any harm, nor were they disturbed by scavenger critters that normally feed on dead animals. Very strange. Could they have been poisoned by the creek water?
Many animals are highly sensitive to environmental toxins, even more so than humans. This is why caged canaries were brought into mines. Dead fish floating in a river implies serious water contamination. Fish breathe in water. Dying wildlife from a chemical spill suggests significant poison exposure. When humans are likewise getting sick in the same area, the words “safe and effective” or “no risk” don’t enter my mind.
Trusting your government-sponsored EPA to declare the toxic site safe for habitation is about as intelligent as taking an mRNA shot from Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, who isn’t man enough to discuss the wretched effects of their “vaccines” with anyone having concerns. I don’t buy it! Call me paranoid if you like. I’d call you wise to follow suit.
You know you’re being lied to when all the climate change activists are completely silent about this compelling train derailment story. For all their hype, the environmental wackos say nothing about the potential or actual risks associated with many new technologies that now likely have a negative influence on our health. Let’s consider a few examples.
The artificially high population density of “farm-raised” animals is one concern. They are significantly more prone to contaminant ingestion, such as was demonstrated with farm-raised salmon and tilapia. Native (or wild) caught anything is generally much healthier than its farm-bred and often genetically-modified counterpart.
All genetically-modified plants and animals are potentially associated with some kind of adverse risk factors when consumed. You can never be sure what you’re getting. “Organic” foods are becoming popular as people increasingly distrust our government. Whenever the genetic code is artificially altered, the forced genetic mutation is always of dubious benefit. Sometimes the intent is to yield a better product, such as increased egg production, more lean cattle, or faster growing pigs.
The desired outcome, however, often also leads to other genetic problems. We see blaring examples of such unnatural selection even among dog species that have been selectively bred for certain desired traits. Inherent new problems always develop, despite good intentions. You should have no trouble imagining what happens when harmful intent is on the mind of the geneticists. (Think, Wuhan lab!)
The Green New Deal proponents are quick to bemoan the use of combustion engines, but say nothing of the ecological impact of lithium and other precious metal mining to produce batteries. And they are blind to the child abuse associated with mining these substances in oppressive countries.
They turn their heads away from the microwave syndrome (electromagnetic hypersensitivity) illnesses affecting people who reside near 5G towers. We now have strong evidence that non-ionizing radiation does cause serious health risks. If you’re experiencing the typical symptoms of frequent headaches, fatigue, depression, skin problems, blood-related problems, neurotoxicity, and other problems — look for a nearby 5G antenna. You may be the victim of electromagnetic toxic exposure.
Read More @ AmericaOutloud.com
