by General Paul E Vallely, America Outloud:
The elites are a very diverse class. They are globalists, entertainers, Wall Street types, international bankers, corporate leaders, and others who have immense influence and power over societies. It is all about self-interest. They typically use their influence for anti-individualistic, immoral, and corrupt ends. The ruling classes express their power by influencing laws and regulations and funding anti-democratic groups.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Intense speculation exists of the “ruling elite” running the world from behind the scenes, which can lead to the presumption that it is all-powerful and infallible. But are they? Identifying the human foibles and underlying desires of those planning centralized domination could increase the likelihood of offsetting their agendas.
The elitists are in trouble now with Donald J Trump and Elon Musk on the global scene.
The Elite and their Motivations
Something that is far too often overlooked in all the conspiracy speculations is the realization that, even if we are under the control of a powerful cabal attempting to manipulate the world to its ends, we are still essentially dealing with fellow human beings. They must have physical, social, and emotional needs, just like everyone else on the planet, even if the latter faculties are too easily neglected in the kind of mind that would plot events like 9/11 (an event widely suspected to have been staged by Western sources as part of a march toward the ‘New World Order’). The personalities engaged must have their own families and friends, and they must be experiencing thoughts, feelings, and concerns in at least some of the directions.
Like most people in our lives, they may believe they are doing the right thing, even though we may believe their plans are foolish. This is a critical point. Everyone has reasons for what they do, and they can often defend their behavior to themselves when faced with significant problems from the outside. The motivations of those who believe that wiping out their people would be a positive move or who say that planning wars and economic breakdowns to affect the creation of a unifying world government are acceptable strategies.
However, many well-intentioned visionaries have voiced the need for such a strategy throughout history. Of course, this does not imply that they are correct, but there is a sizable, if small, segment of humanity who believes that the larger picture should take precedence over the interests of the masses. For example, many who have voiced support for eugenics and depopulation techniques are motivated by deep-seated environmental concerns or the conviction that we have lost our balance with nature and must prioritize the earth’s future over the needs of the public.
Some of the most prominent people in the US, in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody or something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, subtle, watchful, interlocked, complete, and pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.
What stands out most in H.G. Wells’ writings is his sense of joy and passion for the idea of a ruling collective that would put everything right and prevent “the disastrous extinction of Mankind.” A Malthusian dislike for humanity is not discernible, nor is there any sense of malice in the characters’ actions. Wells, on the other hand, was a proponent of eugenics at the same time. Many people find this concept downright repugnant, but here is the paradox: the very types of people who are truth-seekers tend to single out as the enemies of humanity are the very types of people who believe they are the saviors of humanity. It all comes down to one’s point of view and where one decides to draw the line regarding morality.
One world government founded on rigorous scientific values. As the philosopher Bertrand Russell predicted, a global one-world government was inevitable, and Russell was shockingly candid about the civilization that would follow as a result. In his 1953 book The Impact of Science on Society, he writes, “Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from an exceedingly early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the authorities will become psychologically impossible…”
Read More @ AmericaOutloud.com
