Some Thoughts on the Recent Declassified “Release of the FBI Files About Russiagate”

from The Conservative Treehouse:

Things are again not what they seem, but you have to stand back to understand the right questions.

People have asked about the recent release of the declassified FBI documents (a partial release) and what they mean.  Having spent years deep in the research, here’s my take.

At first blush people may say there’s nothing really there that we didn’t already know. I would differ on that perspective because the process is telling us something very loudly, and the absence of material is shouting even louder.

Simple question:  This stuff was declassified by President Trump and released by the FBI, correct?  If so, then why isn’t the release simply uploaded to the FBI.Gov website.  Why release it to congress and then leak it to John Solomon?

TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

Read the underline.  First things first. Explain to me exactly how these were “obtained.”  Where did Solomon get them?

[SOURCE]

If it’s all on the up-and-up, and if it is simply an outcome of declassified material, then why is sourcing for the documents clouded in some weird mystery.  Shouldn’t we know the process?  Those of you who remember the FISA application release, will know why this process issue is important.

Next, the information is given to the founding member of the “Tick Tock” club.  John Solomon has singularly been responsible for more purposefully controlled information releases than any other ‘conservative’ media rep for the Intel Community.  The Russiagate files coming from Solomon should be the first big “red flag” that causes pause.

Who game them to Solomon?  And again, why not just upload them to a .gov website (DNI, FBI or even HPSCI).

I suspect the intention here, the motive of the process, is to focus on the politics of the release, NOT the illegal nature of the conduct that is contained within the evidence the release outlines.  They want the public focused on the “politics” not the “illegal surveillance” and unlawful conduct that underpins Russiagate.

Bottom line on the process aspect.  This is a controlled release of information. We are getting a few pieces of the puzzle affirmed, but the key parts of the same picture are hidden.  I will explain with an example in a moment.

Process matters, because the DC silo defense is partly contingent upon ‘process.’  If the evidence is not discovered within a silo agency, that evidence is never considered by the DC system.  It doesn’t matter if the evidence is accurate, if DC didn’t originate the evidence, it is disregarded [See Durham Investigation for a case study in this].

In order to confront the illegal nature of the conduct behind Russiagate, the process used to discover and/or spotlight the unlawful behavior is critical.  If DC can claim the process is political, DC -and by extension legal accountability- will stay away from it.

This does not mean whoever leaked the files to John Solomon is the originator of the play to deploy politics, it could be the person behind the person who leaked the files to Solomon.

Read More @ TheConservativeTreehouse.com