Will The Pre-Determined Failure Of A Globalist “Peace Plan” Be Used As Justification For European Nations To Enter The War With Russia?

0
428

by Michael Snyder, End Of The American Dream:

Why does every “step forward” seem to bring us even closer to an apocalyptic showdown with Russia?  Now we are being told that the UK, France and other European nations will be working with Ukraine to develop a “plan to stop the fighting”.  We aren’t being given specific details about the plan yet, but there are two things that we do know.  First of all, it will involve European troops on Ukrainian soil.  In fact, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is already telling us that the British are ready to put “boots on the ground”.  Secondly, the plan will almost certainly require the Russians to give back large portions of territory that they have conquered.  Of course the Russians have already clearly stated that they will never accept European troops on Ukrainian soil and that no territory that Russia is currently holding will be returned.  In this case, the Russians have all the leverage because their troops are steadily moving forward.  The bottom line is that the globalists know that there is zero chance that the Russians will agree to the peace plan that they are working on.  So why put forward such a plan at all?

TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

Ultimately, I think that European leaders want to convince their populations that they did “all that they could” before sending their own troops to die in eastern Ukraine.

They know that this “peace plan” is not going to work.  They simply want to justify what they are about to do.

In the article that I published just before this one, I outlined three options that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is facing.  In this article, I want to discuss three options that European leaders are facing.

#1 The first option would be to force Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to make peace with the Russians.  Now that relations with the U.S. have broken down, Zelenskyy cannot continue the war without European support.  Of course making peace with the Russians would mean giving the Russians just about everything that they want because the Russians have all the leverage right now.  This option is untenable for the Europeans, because it would mean losing the war and handing Vladimir Putin a major victory.

#2 The second option would be to continue sending Ukraine cash and military equipment and hope for the best.  Needless to say, that isn’t going to work.  No matter how much cash and equipment the Europeans send to Ukraine, the Ukrainians will lose this war if they are forced to fight the Russians alone.  In the end, the Russians would simply take as much of Ukraine as they felt like taking until they decided that they finally wanted to stop.  That would be a worse outcome for the Europeans than option number one.

#3 The third option would be for European nations to enter the war directly.  As I discussed in my previous article, this is what Zelenskyy desperately wants.  The only way that Ukraine can win this war is if large numbers of western troops are introduced into the conflict.  But of course if European nations start fighting Russia, that puts us right on the brink of nuclear war.  Needless to say, nuclear war would be the worst outcome of all.

Unfortunately, I think that European leaders are rapidly moving toward option number three.

At the “emergency summit” that was held in London on Sunday, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer discussed the “plan to stop the fighting” that European leaders will be working to develop

“We’ve now agreed that the United Kingdom, along with France and possibly one or two others, will work with Ukraine on a plan to stop the fighting, and then we’ll discuss that plan with the United States,” Starmer told the BBC, adding that he and Macron have both spoken to Trump since the latter’s meeting with Zelenskyy.

At Sunday’s summit, European leaders will look toward shoring up the continents’ defenses in defending Ukraine, including discussions to create a European military force to send to the war-torn country to cap a cease-fire. Starmer suggested the military force would include a “coalition of the willing.”

Ominously, Starmer told the press that the UK is ready to enforce a ceasefire with boots on the ground and fighter jets in the air…

“The UK is prepared to back this with BOOTS on the ground and planes in the air.”

And when he was specifically asked about the potential for war with Russia, Starmer did not rule that out

Asked whether there is now more of a real prospect of Britain being at war with Russia, Sir Keir Starmer said: “The reason I’ve been forward-leaning on this is because I want to avoid conflict, because I do not want conflict in Ukraine, in Europe…I want stability in the United Kingdom.

“The way to ensure that stability is to ensure that we are able to defend a deal in Ukraine, because the one thing our history tells us is that if there is conflict in Europe, it will wash up on our shores.

There is not going to be any “deal in Ukraine” and they know that.

The Russians have stated over and over again that no European soldiers will be permitted in Ukraine.

Starmer very clearly understands what the Russian position is.

If UK troops are sent to Ukraine, it won’t be to “defend” a deal.

It will be to fight a war.

And as Mike Cernovich has aptly pointed out, if British soldiers start dying in eastern Ukraine that could be a way to draw the United States directly into the conflict…

The plan is for the UK to send soldiers to Ukraine, set them up to be shot by Russians or in a false flag attack, and then claim Article 5 of the NATO treaty requires the United States to send soldiers to bail them out.

Of course it wouldn’t just be British troops that would get targeted.

On Sunday, we learned that Russian missiles had sunk a cargo ship that was delivering British weapons to Ukraine…

Read More @ EndOfTheAmericanDream.com