by Willow Tohi, Natural News:
-
- The U.K. government has introduced a tool to map vulnerable groups (based on age, disability and care status) to provide “targeted support” during crises. Critics warn it risks privacy violations and overreach.
- The tool is part of a broader effort to address gaps exposed by the COVID-19 Inquiry, including the largest national pandemic exercise in a decade, involving 4,000+ emergency workers.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
-
- Critics, like healthcare entrepreneur Jonathan Engler, cite past harms to vulnerable groups (e.g., restrictive 2020 measures) and fear the tool could enable similar outcomes under the guise of “support.”
-
- The tool aligns with the Declaration’s “focused protection” approach but raises concerns about balancing targeted aid with autonomy and privacy.
-
- The government faces demands to clarify how “targeted support” will work, ensure accountability and avoid marginalizing groups, especially with a 2025 emergency alert test looming.
In a move that has sparked both praise and concern, the U.K. government has announced the creation of a Risk Vulnerability Tool designed to map and identify vulnerable groups across the country. This tool, developed by the Cabinet Office in collaboration with the Office for National Statistics, is part of a broader national pandemic response exercise scheduled for this fall. While the government claims it is a measure to provide “targeted support” during future crises, critics argue that such measures could undermine personal privacy and freedom of choice.
A nation on high alert
The announcement follows the U.K. COVID-19 Inquiry’s Module 1 report, which highlighted significant gaps in the country’s preparedness for the pandemic. The government has pledged to learn from these mistakes and is rolling out a series of measures to enhance resilience and response capabilities.
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, The Rt Hon. Pat McFadden MP, said, “We must learn lessons from the COVID pandemic as we cannot afford to make the same mistakes again. However, we will plan in a way that recognizes the next crisis may not be the same as the last. We agree with the Inquiry that more needs to be done, and we are announcing measures to make sure that we are as prepared as possible for future pandemics.”
One of these measures is the largest national pandemic response exercise in nearly a decade, set to involve over 4,000 resilience and emergency workers trained through the U.K. Resilience Academy. The exercise will test the country’s capabilities, plans, protocols and procedures in the event of another major pandemic, with participation from all government departments, local resilience forums and devolved governments.
A bold but controversial step
The Risk Vulnerability Tool is perhaps the most controversial aspect of the government’s new pandemic preparedness strategy. The tool creates a detailed map of the U.K., identifying vulnerable groups based on data including age, disability and whether an individual is receiving care. The stated aim is to improve the government’s understanding of where disproportionately impacted groups are located ahead of and during crises, enabling targeted local support where needed.
However, this tool has raised significant privacy concerns. Jonathan Engler, a British healthcare entrepreneur, noted, “What sort of support will these targeted people receive? There’s plenty of evidence that ‘vulnerable’ individuals were subjected to protocols which ended their lives prematurely, with such deaths being classified as ‘COVID deaths.'”
This concern is not unfounded. During the 2020 pandemic, there were instances where vulnerable groups were subjected to measures that some argue shortened their lives. Engler points to testimonies from the Scottish COVID Inquiry, which have been widely shared on platforms like Biologyphenom’s Substack, highlighting the harrowing experiences of many individuals.
Historical context and modern implications
The idea of “targeted support” is not new. It is a central tenet of the Great Barrington Declaration, a document advocating for “focussed protection” to manage pandemics without widespread lockdowns. Engler, who has written extensively on the topic, urges readers to revisit this document, which he describes as “an essential read for anyone interested in understanding the nuances of pandemic management.”
