by Joseph P. Farrell, Giza Death Star:
Before we get to today’s main blog, and the first blog of 2025, please allow me to say thank you to all of your for your patience and well-wishes during my Christmas-birthday vacation. 2025 is upon us, and sadly we are starting the year off with more tragedy in California, home of the (un)necessary wild fire.
I’ve seldom seen such a steady stream of articles about a story as this one, as I think it fair to say that I’ve had more articles about this than even about the hurricane that struck North Carolina and eastern Tennessee, and a feature of both of these streams has been the galloping government incompetence and corruption that constitute backgrounds of both stories, from Bai Den Jao’s gutting of the finances of FEMA to “help” the illegal migrants, to the same sort of thoughtless supply of firefighting trucks – from California(!) – to that country.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Many of the articles have also drawn attention to the fact that State Farm and other large insurers simply refuse to underwrite home owners policies in the LA area, and here is where I must part company from some of the articles I have received. These have with but one or two exceptions all opined that the California fires were deliberately set, and that they serve some hidden agenda, such as forcing people into fifteen minute cities.
In support of this view, some of the articles have alleged that Der Hochklaus Freiherr von Blohschwab-und-Bloviation and the creatures of his ilk at the gigantic grifters’ club that is the World Economic Forum has exhibited his normal ghoulish behavior and welcomed the fires as another grand crisis to exploit to further his sick and twisted visions of the future (article shared by V.T. with our thanks):
While I’ve not seen any corroborative source for Der Hochklaus’ or the World Economic Forum’s alleged sentiments, suffice it to say it would not surprise me. The man is a ghoul and a grifter, presiding over a gaggle of ghouls and grifters. My real point is that virtually none of the articles I’ve seen is viewing these fires as “just another fire season in Looneyfornia.” Most, without question, take the view that the fires were deliberately set, either by conventional arson, or by other more exotic means (with our old friend, “directed energy weapons” being the cultprit, which we’ll get back to in a moment). But back to main main point: many of these articles have focused on the withdrawal of many insurers refusing to insure California home owners against the fire danger as being proof of the deliberateness of the action, and that these fires were deliberately set. However, the two – withdrawal of insureres, and deliberately set fires – are not logically related.
If there is any factor about this whole tragedy that is logically related to the insurers refusing to insure California homeowners, it is that the insurers are rational actors, and the policies of the party running California – including many of the unfortunate home owners who continue to vote for that party and its policies – have made it impossible for the insurers to stand by and continue to insure in a state (1) that has cut back on the funding and building reservoirs in order to protect some obscure endangered species of smelt; (2) that will not permit and does not support controlled burns of its underbrush; (3) that cuts its local city, county, and state firefighting budget while shipping some of those fire-fighting resources to the Ukraine; and finally, (4) that has a collection of some of the most dim-witted and irresponsible politicians one can imagine, but thank goodness, both Gavin and Nancy at least have good haircuts. If you were an insurance company, knowing all these actuarial risks, would you insure in California? I doubt that even Lloyds of London with all of its money would would do so, even at outrageous premiums.
