by Joseph P. Farrell, Giza Death Star:
On Monday last I reviewed four articles having to do with all the drone sightings in New Jersey, and now, elsewhere around the country, noting that some aspects of the original narrative – namely that they posed no threat and that the goobernment did not know what they were – had collapsed with the alleged crash and recovery of one of the drones, and that New York Governor Kathy Hochul had called for answers from the feds when an airport had to be shut down because of the potential threat.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
But we did not get to the most interesting aspect of the problem: the question of who was behind the whole thing, and what the objectives may be. There are many possibilities here, and in my opinion, there are three that head the list:
(1) the American deep state, or breakaway civilization, itself;
(2) some foreign power or powers, either hostile or friendly to, the United States, or a mixture of both; and,
(3) some non-territorial actor with pretensions or claims to sovereignty.
Let’s begin by noticing something that – to my knowledge – has not been pointed out: the current drone flap originated in New Jersey. Turn the clock back to the 1930s, and to Orson Welles’ famous (or infamous) radio broadcast play of H.G. Wells’ novel, The War of the Worlds, and one will find two rather interesting and intriguing parallels between the contemporary drone story and the Orson Welles broadcast, namely, in the broadcast, some of the first Martian ships crash into the New Jersey countryside, and the panic that the broadcast engendered actually began and spread from there. But there is another, even stranger, parallel between the Welles broadcast, the original novel, and the contemporary story, and that is that in the original story the Martian ships – which turn out to be weapons of war – are also capable of negotiating the Earth’s oceans and destroying humanity’s then-most-powerful weapons of war, the battleship.
These considerations were why I had to spell out the methodology, that we assume the reports to be true, and not media-fabricated or embellished lies. After all, the media has lied about many things in recent memory – the legitimacy of the 2020 elections, the covid plandscamdemic, Russiagate, the Hunter laptop, “safe and effective” quackines, &c &c – it could certainly gin up a “drone crisis.”
This consideration brings us to the “who” and “why” of the current drone operation, for there is little doubt in my mind that we are looking at someone’s “operation”. So let us assume the most obvious possibility: that the operation is that of some group within the American deep state and power structure. What is the goal and purpose? I suggest that this is disclosed by the comparison to the infamous War of the Worlds broadcast, namely, it is a social engineering experiment, to see how the public responds to an unknown and anomalous event or circumstance, how local and state officials respond, and how best to structure and tailor the public statements in order to create a narrative. Indeed, it could be a “beta test” on how to manipulate and create a narrative of “alien invasion.” such a social engineering and psychological warfare experiment in my opinion was actually behind the original Orson Welles broadcast. The drones have updated it a bit. But the template is remarkably similar.
A similar purpose could be at work if any of the drone appearances were being operated by some hostile or friend foreign power or groups of powers, along with the added purposes of collecting and gathering data, and measuring the degree of response, and coordination (or lack thereof) between local, state, and federal authorities in response to a highly anomalous circumstance or event. Indeed, this last purpose is far more likely than that of data collecting. After all, America’s “favorite enemies” – Russia and China – have very sophisticated spy satellites by which to gather data and information. They do not need to use drones (or for that matter, balloons!). But a social engineering test might be a different matter. On this score it is worth noting that one U.S. Congressman has put out the idea that the drones are coming from an Iranian mothership (“from the direction of the ocean”), and are a technology supplied to Iran by China. My problem with this scenario, however, is that it is very risky, and would invite retaliation if exposed. Why run a test of such a scenario, and tip off the enemy (in this case the United States) about a possible much larger operation involving drones. As I stated previously, such an operation on a coordinated national and international scale could create a real crisis, of hundreds of aircraft being unable to land or take off. The sophistication of some of these alleged drones – the implied ability to go from submersible to air operations, for example, or the ability to simply “vanish” in other stories – seems to be displaying a technology out of proportion to the benefit being gained from exposing it, and risking its potential capture. Would Iran or China take such a chance? I highly doubt it.
And that consideration brings me to the possibility that in my opinion is a moderately strong possibility: a non-territorial actor with pretentions or claims to sovereignty: a Blackrock or “Nazi international” type of entity. Might such an entity be wiling to test such exotic technologies in conjunction with a reconnoitering operation designed to test responses, and in conjunction also with an operation designed for social engineering and narrative creation purposes? I think the answer is yes, and so much the better, because it allows the government to say it knows nothing, under the cover of plausible deniability. Indeed, it knows nothing; it may only suspect.
