by Hugo Dionísio, Strategic Culture:
If he were far right-wing, the West would happily work with him. That’s the best absorbent cotton test for determining whether or not a particular candidate is extreme right-wing. The West has always had a huge tolerance for right-wingers. From fanatic Islamists to neo-Nazis or Zionists, history is here to prove that.
The capitalist, imperialist, neo-liberal West has never had any problem working with fanatics of any kind, as can be seen in Syria today. What the West can’t stand, whoever they are, are leaders who don’t allow national independence and sovereignty, the common interest, and social welfare to be limited by private appropriation by the international economic and financial interests it protects.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
The truth is that West has no problems working with Meloni in Italy, Milei in Argentina, the current South Korean president, or even the Saudi royal family. Even to name the ones who everyone assumes to be hard right-wingers. We must not forget that, nowadays, at the very heart of the Western political system, we have the most fanatic and extremist situationists, such as Von Der Leyen, Baerbock, Sholz, or Macron. They only differ from traditional far-right-wingers in two or three subjects like wokeísm, religiosity (not all of them), acceptance of Brussels’ central power, and their position towards war with Russia.
In Syria, for example, they have joined hands with groups formed from Al-Qaeda, linked to the Islamic Brotherhood, one theological school that also feeds Hamas, overthrowing a secular government that defends gender equality, but also national sovereignty, particularly in terms of ownership of strategic sectors, like energy. It won’t be long before the mainstream press is crying hard over the oppression of Syrian women. For starters, I saw no feminine presence in the press conferences that new Syrian leaders provided. The U.S. and Israel don’t seem to have had any problems dealing with conservative authoritarian Erdogan, as an operative in the upheaval, or with “moderate radicals” that came from known terrorist organizations. If someone can explain to me what is a “moderate radical”, be my guest. A semiotic upgrade made from the ancient paradox concept of “moderate rebels”.
So there would be nothing to stop the West from working with Calin Georgescu too. If he is, like mainstream media assumes, a far-right winger, what would stop them? Don’t they do it with Zelensky and the supporters of Bandera’s ideology? After all, what does Georgescu stand for that the West has so vehemently used its lawfare machine to try to end his more than predictable election? Between Tik-Tok algorithm manipulation and “Russian interference” Western powers and their judicial agents found the justification to destroy a democratic election.
So, in one fell swoop, the powers that dominate Romania today, and through which an oligarchic elite clings to power, annulled the election, trying to buy time so that, either through a scheme to prevent the candidate in question from standing for election, or perhaps through the repetition of as many election procedures as necessary until the results are right, as was done in the failed referendums on the European constitution in France and Ireland, the U.S. can rest and build its powerful military base for attacking the Russian Federation.
This brutal course of action, incomparable and unthinkable a few years ago, is in itself indicative of the state of desperation in which the powers that dominate Romania find themselves. The construction of NATO’s largest European military base and the use of this country as a springboard for a nuclear war, which is on the horizon, make Romania a key country for the whole strategy of dominating Europe and the Russian Federation. These elections in Romania could therefore very well end with a formal or informal military dictatorship, in the name of a supposedly existent “Russian interference”.
Today, “Russian interference” is to NATO countries what the “communist bogeyman” was to Western fascists. The pretext for extinguishing what little democracy remains. To that end, freedom will go too. We can say that, as things go, the U.S. and NATO are prisoners of democracy itself. Their candidate can’t win, and the ones who can, don’t work for U.S. and NATO intents. From personal candidature denial to martial law, supported by a need to prevent a “Russian political takeover”, as it goes, Romania can provide us with a practical guide that shows, step by step what the West could do when European peoples start to take back their countries.
A starting point to this anticipative coup d’état can be stated when Calin Georgescu, at the beginning of this year, when asked by a journalist what he thought of the upcoming election year, replied, “This year will be the year of changing the system”. Now, that a far right-winger guy talks about “changing the system”… At least, is suspicious. As a right-winger, he should have been talking about “cleaning up the system” but never about “changing it”.
Read More @ Strategic-Culture.org
