by Rhoda Wilson, Expose News:
On Monday, the German online magazine Luafpass provided a report on civil rights activist and lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich’s 37th day in court.
For over a year, Dr. Fuellmich has been dragged through a German court, with the 37th day of the trial taking place on 11 November 2024. His trial has been and continues to be characterised by a lack of transparency, with the court excluding the public and only allowing written submissions, violating the German Court Constitution Act and the EU Convention on Human Rights.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Additionally, Dr. Fuellmich has been subjected to physical and psychological abuse, including solitary confinement, shackling and humiliation, which are forms of white torture.
However, Dr. Fuellmich has not given up fighting. On his 37th day in court, Dr. Fuellmich announced two criminal charges against the prosecution and the judges: the perversion of justice, and grievous bodily harm and attempted homicide.
Elsa, author of the Substack page ‘Truth Summit’, has been posting regular updates on Reiner Fuellmich’s case. At the beginning of this month, she published a letter that had been written to all law students at the University Of Gottingen:
Today, November 3rd 2024, we would like to bring to your attention a case of torture happening in your city, a case which can be compared to cases of people like Nelson Mandela and Julian Assange.
Today, it is Reiner Fuellmich, one of your very own People of Law, a Professor at your university a few years ago, who is tortured daily in the Rosdorf Prison as described in this link, ‘The persecution of Reiner Fuelmich’ – by Robin Westenra. In the spirit of Rudolf von Jhering and of those who taught in your university since the establishment of your Faculty of Law in 1737, we are calling upon your desire to see Justice prevail by contributing and joining our collective action to have this illegal procedure conducted by the Court of Justice of Göttingen exposed and stopped, and demand Mr. Fuellmich’s release so he can be reunited with his wife and defend himself in accordance with the Rule of Law.
For Reiner: University Of Gottingen Law Faculty And Law Students Contacted By Pascal, Truth Summit, 3 November 2024
On Tuesday, Elsa published another update which consisted of a video report which is in German (with English subtitles) and the article published by Laufpass below, followed by a list of resources for “excellent overviews of the Reiner Fuellmich case” and past and future trial dates. You can read Elsa’s full article HERE and donate to Dr. Fuellmich’s case HERE.
And Every Day, Groundhog Day
By Kerstin Heusinger as published by Luafpass on 11 November 2024
37th Day of the Trial of Dr. Reiner Füllmich
The 37th day of the trial of civil rights activist Dr. Reiner Füllmich, under the direction of Judge Carsten Schindler at the Göttingen District Court, once again proved that in these dark days, no public prosecutor is needed to ensure the legal prosecution of a dissident. A mixture of evidence-obstructing jurisprudence and misanthropy characterises the proceedings, which have kept Dr. Reiner Füllmich in pre-trial detention for over a year and in isolation torture for months.
“In a criminal case, the guilt or innocence of the defendant is to be determined and a just verdict is to be passed.” This is still the position of the Lower Saxony Ministry of Justice. However, this apparently does not apply to the District Court in Göttingen. It refuses to allow the accused to present exonerating evidence by questioning witnesses or to have the credibility of incriminating witnesses examined, as in the case of the actors V. Fischer and J. Hoffmann, who initiated the persecution of the civil rights activist with their fellow actors M. Templin and A. Fischer.
According to § 244 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the following applies in paragraph 2: “In order to ascertain the truth, the court shall, ex officio, extend the taking of evidence to all facts and means of evidence that are of importance for the decision.” This also applies to exonerating facts and evidence. The behaviour of the Göttingen judges suggests that they only want to collect incriminating facts and evidence. Can this be seen as prejudice? The intent to convict seems unmistakable.
