by J.B. Shurk, American Thinker:
It appears that the slow-witted political operatives behind this season’s production of “Harris/Walz: Lights, Camera, Cackle” have finally figured out that they have a serious “man problem” — as in no man with a modicum of testosterone running through his veins would dare be caught bearing the brand of the “trans”-hyping, willy-chopping, child-sniffing Democrat party. Congratulations, pals and gals (and xals) — glad you’re waking up to the reality that you’ve created an ideological movement that caters chiefly to Kens who dress up as Barbie, advocates for legalizing pedophilia, and a lot of people who would very much like to speak with the manager.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Silver-tongued political pundit Scott Jennings made this point last weekend on CNN: “Working-class men, whether black, Hispanic, or white, consistently do not believe the Democratic Party and specifically Kamala Harris are going to do a thing for them.” That’s right: men of every color understand that Democrats are out to get them! In response to Jennings’s reasonable observation, his lefty co-panelists twisted themselves into all manner of incredulous gasps and how dare you, sir! hysterics. Their faux outrage was unintentionally hilarious. What, us? We don’t hate men! How could anybody cast such ghastly aspersions at the party of “inclusion”!?
The Democrat Party whines about everything. It is the whiniest whiny party that has ever existed. But there is nothing that more quickly drives its members toward the zenith of ear-splitting, screeching whininess than the thought of heterosexual men having independent opinions. Unless you’re a friend of the Village People or traded in your “man card” for one of those pink stocking caps long ago (here’s looking at you, Mark Hamill!), they’ve got nothing but hate for those with a Y-chromosome (except for the she-he fakes who body-slam female athletes on playing fields).
Democrats don’t want to hear from men. They don’t want to see them explaining things on television. They don’t want to understand their problems or concerns. And they certainly don’t want them to exercise any economic or political power. As far as leftists are concerned, the days of men being the family’s breadwinner and strong protector are over.
Not only do Democrats want to figuratively (and quite often literally) neuter boys and men, but they also are invested in building a future in which manhood is understood as some kind of deadly disease. No academic discipline has been spared from the left’s insatiable misandry. Using the language of anthropology and sociology, Democrats have invented “mansplaining” and “manspreading” to shame men for ordinary behaviors. Using the language of medicine and psychology, Democrats have invented “toxic masculinity” so they can diagnose men as “dangerous” to society. Using the language of political science, Democrats have invented the dreaded “patriarchy” so they can discredit any kind of government with male leaders.
Through junk science and overt propaganda, the Democrat party is constructing a world in which masculinity is viewed as abnormal and men are viewed with contempt. Through language and policy, leftists justify blanket discrimination against men unless they first apologize for their “privilege” and subdue their biological instincts. As far as Democrats are concerned, men who refuse to be re-engineered into something that they are not deserve to be jobless, disrespected, shamed, and even reviled. The most masculine “offenders” deserve nothing less than involuntary commitment in the closest psych ward until they can be reprogrammed into something less threatening to the Democrat party. Think General Mark Milley telling Congress, “I want to understand white rage.” To that, I say: Thank you for your service, ma’am.
After decades of being told that they are what’s wrong with the world, a lot of men have finally had enough. They are tired of being portrayed in commercials as clueless and in movies as the enemy of all women. They are tired of having their leadership abilities disparaged as inherently “sexist.” They are tired of being branded “intolerant” for believing that merit, hard work, and professionalism deserve higher consideration than modern fetishes for “gender identity,” “queerness,” and made-up pronouns. They are tired of being simultaneously criticized for holding doors open for women and leaving doors closed for women to open themselves. They are tired of having every instance of innocent flirtation and every example of gentlemanly chivalry demonized as some kind of “violence” against the opposite sex.
Read More @ AmericanThinker.com
