Are Governments Planning on Nuclear War to Reduce Population for Climate Change?

0
465

by Martin Armstrong, Armstrong Economics:

QUESTION: Marty, I know you have been trying to reduce the amplitude of your computer’s forecast for war. You probably deserve the Nobel Peace Prize. They gave it to Obama for trying to invade Syria. It appears that the military establishment does read you. Biden directed them to prepare for nuclear war with China, Russia, and North Korea last March, according to the New York Times. This confirms that there is a risk, and they know it but keep pushing for war with Russia anyway. Is this all because of the debt crisis? They seem to be complete idiots.

TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

Please comment on this latest info.

JJ

Reagan in quest of peaceMikhail Gorbachev and Maagie Thatcher

 

ANSWER: I do not understand why this crop of leaders around the world in the West are all promoting war as if this can even be won. Look, thirty years ago, everyone wanted world peace – including every Miss America. Today, I would not be surprised if Miss America stood up and said she wanted to see World War III. These are two items from my political collection of memorabilia. I agree with you that it just seems as if they are planning on hiding in their bunkers and are planning on reducing the population all for climate change.

Biden Secon Term

Did we get enough of them?

 

Hiroshima_Google_Maps

Nagasaki Japan

Nuclear Bomb

This illustration shows the radius of a 100-megatonne nuclear bomb dropped on New York City. Nuclear War will not destroy the planet. Look at Japan. Both Hiroshima and Nagasaki have proven that the “science” claimed that those cities would be uninhabitable for a thousand years after a nuclear war was wrong. Their populations doubled in 20 years after being nuked? Hiroshima now has nine times its 1945 population.

The GOOD NEWS is you can then just nuke your opponent and actually save the planet is their twisted view of nuclear war. Without electricity, your opponent could not even make a phone call to launch a response. But if we look at Chornobyl, the nuclear disaster restored the region, which became a sanctuary for animals void of humans, in Ukraine.

Bikini Atoll Test 1024x545Bikini Atoll, 70 years after nuclear tests, is thriving. On July 24, 1946, the Baker Test shrouded its formidable height over the U.S. Navy’s test fleet. The United States dropped 23 nuclear bombs on the island, including a device in 1954 that was 1,100 times larger than the Hiroshima atom bomb. Now, a team of scientists from Stanford University has been stunned. They discovered an abundance of marine life apparently thriving in the crater of Bikini Atoll, which was declared a nuclear wasteland after the bombings.

Strangely enough, the same has been found at Chornobyl in Ukraine. It is starting to emerge that even setting off every nuclear bomb will not destroy the planet or turn Earth into space rocks. We can alter our environment by doing so and ridding the planet of humanity as the dominant species. Still, Earth will heal itself, and life will adapt exactly as scientists have discovered in Ukraine at the site of Chornobyl. Wildlife has thrived because it sent humans running.

This new evidence emerging from Chornobyl and Bikini Atoll demonstrates that we may not be as smart as we think, no less all-powerful. Those pushing for World War III see themselves far smarter than we are. They are really trying to save the planet from us – or that’s what they are whispering in the dark bowel of government. Exterminate humanity, and we can save the bugs and crickets from becoming our next food source.

Read More @ ArmstrongEconomics.com