Remote Control Of The Human Brain, Crowd Control Technologies – Democracy, The Republic And Human Rights Cannot Be Preserved With The Existence And Use Of High Risk AI Systems

0
167

by Mojmir Babacek, Strategic Culture:

In the year 2000 the Scientific and Technological Options Assessment (STOA) panel of the European Parliament published a study entitled “Crowd Control Technologies” where it wrote:

“in October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their place in allied arsenals… The most controversial non-lethal crowd control and anti-materiel technology proposed by the US are so called Radio Frequency or Directed Energy Weapons that can allegedly manipulate human behavior in a variety of unusual ways… the greatest concern is with systems which can directly interact with the human nervous system… The research undertaken to date both in the US and in Russia can be divided into two related areas: (i) individual mind control and (ii) crowd control” (pg.liii). 

TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

Directed energy system was further defined in the technical annex as „Directed energy weapon system designed to match radio frequency source to interfere with human brain activity at synapse level, with the note:

“Highly classified program and hard data is difficult to access” (pg. 67).

In the 1990’s, the USA were constructing the radar system HAARP, which according to the book by Nick Begich and Jeanne Maning “Angels Don’t Play this HAARP”, can be used to control the activity of human brains in large areas of the planet.

After the publication of the book,  the European Parliament held a special hearing, where the co-author of the book Nick Begich was testifying. As a result of his testimony the European Parliament adopted a resolution, where it called “for an international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings“ (paragraph 30). Against possible expectations, the European media did not publish and explain this call. The evident reason was that weapon systems “designed to match radio frequency source to interfere with human brain activity at synapse level” were “highly classified” or in other words qualified as information related to national defense.

On December 9, 2023, 23 years after this publication, the press service of the European parliament informed about a “political deal with the Council on a bill to ensure AI in Europe is safe, respects fundamental human rights, while businesses can thrive and expand”. It stated:

“recognizing the potential threat to citizens’ rights and democracy posed by certain applications of AI, the co-legislators agreed to prohibit: … AI systems that manipulate human behavior to circumvent their free will”.

As well it declared:

“for AI systems classified as high-risk (due to their significant potential harm to health, safety, fundamental rights, environment, democracy and the rule of law), clear obligations were agreed“. 

However so far the EU did not publish the fact that mass manipulation of the activity of human brains at distance is actually feasible. As well it did not ban the use of directed or radio frequency weapons to remotely manipulate the activity of nervous systems of individuals or masses of people.

Read More @ Strategic-Culture.org