You Are the Target of Hybrid Warfare

0
551

by Harley Schlanger, LaRouche Organization:

This article is a slightly-edited transcript of a presentation delivered to Panel 4 of the Schiller Institute online conference by Harley Schlanger, on June 16, 2024.  Schlanger is the Vice-President of the Board of the Schiller Institute.  The video of the June 15-16 conference is linked here: The World on the Brink: For a New Peace of Westphalia!

by Harley Schlanger

Is it possible that you think “wrong”? That how you think and what you believe makes you an enemy of the state? That what you assume are your own ideas — for example, that you don’t want hundreds of billions of tax dollars going to fight unwinnable and endless wars, ending up in the pockets of Ukrainian kleptocrats and U.S. defense contractors — actually have been planted in your mind by that devious war criminal, Vladimir Putin? And that your opposition to the slaughter of children and women in Palestine is proof that you are antisemitic?

TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

Whether you know it or not, you are the target of what is called “hybrid warfare”. And if it doesn’t lead to the extinction of mankind in thermonuclear war, it means minimally that if you are an American, the protection of your rights and freedoms, which you believe to be enshrined in the Constitution, is being taken away. There is a name for this suppression of freedom of speech and inquiry — it’s called “fascism.”

I will present a glimpse into how this works, and how we have allowed this to happen. It begins with the concept of TRUTH.

KEATS VERSUS HYBRID WARFARE

“Beauty is truth, truth beauty — that is all

Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.”

In his “Ode on a Grecian Urn” the poet John Keats investigates the relationship between truth and beauty; beauty may be preserved in art, and like truth is eternal, but what makes it so? That both beauty and truth are products of the human mind, the result of creative discovery; and both may be elusive, difficult to describe in words, but they are knowable, particularly through a uniquely human mental process of discovery that requires the use of irony, and metaphor — as in Keats’ use of the Grecian urn.

There is a different, subversive view of truth, as expressed by Lord Bertrand Russell, who Lyndon LaRouche described as the most evil man of the 20th century.

In his 1952 “Impact of Science on Society,” Russell wrote:

“The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at. First, that the influence of home is obstructive. Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten. Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective. Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity…. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black.…”

Bertrand Russell
Bertrand Russell

He concludes this section by warning, “While this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.”

Russell was one of the creators of what some today call the “post-truth era”. Create a “narrative”, e.g., that “snow is black”; reinforce it in schools, in culture; isolate and punish those who believe otherwise — “If you still believe snow is white, you must be a puppet of Putin.”

Here is a more recent statement of this view of truth, from the dystopian futurist Yuval Harari, from 2018:

“A cursory look at history reveals that propaganda and disinformation are nothing new. In fact, humans have always lived in the age of post-truth. Homo sapiens is a post-truth species…. We are the only mammals that can cooperate with numerous strangers because only we can invent fictional stories, spread them around, and convince millions of others to believe in them. As long as everybody believes in the same fictions, we all obey the same laws and can thereby cooperate effectively.”

“The truth is, truth has never been high on the agenda of Homo sapiens. If you stick to unalloyed reality, few people will follow you. False stories have an intrinsic advantage over the truth when it comes to uniting people.”

This is the key to what is called “hybrid warfare”. Lyndon LaRouche described this in a June 2004 article, “What Does Culture Do?” He wrote about the creation, in 1950 by the Dulles networks in the CIA, in collaboration with British psychological warfare experts, of the Congress for Cultural Freedom, with the goal of inducing mass insanity — a “dumbing down” of the population — through the deliberate destruction of children’s ability to engage in the process of the creative discovery of truth. This is not new, he wrote, tracing its origins back to the enemies of Plato in Greece among the Sophists and Aristotle. But today, there are more sophisticated weapons available, in digital technologies, in social media, which reinforce what he bluntly called “brainwashing.”

HYBRID WARFARE

One year later, Marine Gen. James Mattis, coined the term “hybrid warfare” in a speech to the U.S. Naval Institute, when he delivered a paper co-authored by Lt. Col. Frank Hoffman. He argued that wars “cannot be won by focusing on [weapons] technology.” It is now necessary to engage in “information warfare.” The tools of choice for warfare today must become “misinformation, disinformation and mal-information.” Mattis later became NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander for Transformation, then served as Secretary of Defense in the Trump administration. What he presented was proliferated through numerous NATO conferences and papers. One paper presented by Stefano Marcuzzi at the NATO Foundation Defense College, asserted that in hybrid warfare, “the battle is everywhere, often simultaneously…it erodes the distinction between combatants and noncombatants….A pervasive and manipulated media can influence the development of a conflict,” as it is necessary to achieve “victory in the information space.”

Which brings us to NATO’s creation of a hybrid warfare operation embedded within the Zelensky government in Ukraine.

Read More @ LaRoucheOrganization.com