by Rhoda Wilson, Expose News:
Epigenetic modifications are influenced by environmental factors, pharmaceutical and nutritional elements, lifestyle and developmental stages.
The human body and soul today are reeling under relentless epigenetic warfare, Dr. Mathew Maavak writes and explores two causative factors for epigenetic changes – constituents of food and vaccines – and their potential effects.
In the following, the second part of his series, Dr. Maavak delves into genetically modified food and its impact potentially for two or three generations after the person who consumed it. And he raises the possibility of the hepatitis A vaccines causing a surge in female gender dysphoria.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
You can read the first part of Dr. Maavak’s series HERE.
Before we get to Dr. Maavak’s article, a brief explanation of what epigenetics is to help visualise the concepts he is discussing.
DNA is the molecule that contains the genetic instructions and genes are segments of DNA that encode the instructions for a particular trait or characteristic. Another way to put it is: DNA is responsible for storing genetic information while genes are responsible for expressing that information.
Epigenetic changes are genetic modifications that impact gene activity without changing the DNA sequence. It refers to external modifications to DNA that turn genes “on” or “off.” These modifications do not change the DNA sequence, but instead, they affect how cells “read” genes.
Epigenetic changes can influence various physiological and pathological outcomes and behavioural traits. The infographic in the slideshow below was produced by the Centre on the Developing Child at Harvard University. It shows how children’s experiences affect their genes. You can see the original infographic in larger print HERE.
Can foreign DNA control your soul? — Part 2
While our physical traits are more or less predetermined by DNA, it is the genes within which are responsible for the development of particular traits. This has been a consistent finding in the field of epigenetics.
A recent article in The Conversation sums up epigenetics pretty well in layman-friendly terms:
Epigenetics refers to shifts in gene expression that occur without changes to the DNA sequence. Some epigenetic changes are an aspect of cell function, such as those associated with ageing. However, environmental factors also affect the functions of genes, meaning people’s behaviours affect their genetics. For instance, identical twins develop from a single fertilised egg, and as a result, they share the same genetic makeup. However, as the twins age, their appearances may differ due to distinct environmental exposures.
Epigenetic modifications are influenced by environmental factors, pharmaceutical and nutritional elements, lifestyle and developmental stages. They play crucial roles in normal development, cellular differentiation and disease processes. For instance, epigenetic changes can affect cancer progression, metabolic disorders, and neurodegenerative diseases. Unlike genetic mutations, epigenetic modifications are often reversible, making them a significant area of interest for therapeutic interventions. Understanding epigenetics provides insights into how genes and the environment interact to shape health and disease outcomes across generations.
Epigenetic studies on identical twins have also effectively demolished the “gay gene” theory. It was discovered that the adoption of a homosexual lifestyle by one identical twin is rarely replicated in the genetically identical kin. The argument that “I was born this way” is therefore based on politically-dictated fraudulent science.
While the field of epigenetics is vast and often poorly understood, I will focus on three elements which can activate novel gene expressions in the human body.
Transfused Blood
According to geneticist and evolutionary biologist Richard Lewontin (1929-2021), blood is subject to the same heredity rules as human organs.
Nearly 120 million units of blood are donated globally every year, with 25 million units transfused in Europe alone. They have become a ubiquitous life-saving medical procedure which, in turn, could be the reason why relatively few studies have focused on the psychological impacts of blood transfusion.
Yet, there are blood transfusion recipients who have reported changes in their mood, behaviour and even memories after undergoing the procedure. In a 2017 study coordinated out of the University of Geneva, six out of seven study participants “acknowledged the possibility that transfusions might induce changes in behaviour or values … Three subjects clearly stated that they would refuse to receive blood from a criminal for fear that some negative characteristic may be transmitted to them. Furthermore, three subjects acknowledged that their transfusion might have changed their own behaviour or values.”
One study participant claimed that his sleep was marked by a rise in the number of dreams post-transfusion while another claimed that his sense of taste had changed. The latter found it worrying, saying: “I hope that the donor’s blood cannot take over.” One of the patients reported that “he felt happier and stronger” post-transfusion.
The authors of the study admitted that “further research in a larger population is warranted to evaluate the incidence of a perceived change in behaviour or values after a blood transfusion.”
There is a growing perception that donor memories may be stored as “chemical codes” inside transfused blood.
Donor traits may be transferred to blood transfusion recipients in a manner paralleling the organ transplantation process.
Read more: Can foreign DNA control your soul? – Part 1, Dr. Mathew Maavak, 11 June 2024
In a world gripped by constant pandemic fearmongering, there is growing circumspection over transfused blood from donors who have received the covid-19 and other novel vaccines. The vaccinated blood may act as an epigenetic bioreactor for a multiplicity of adverse events associated with covid-19 vaccines.
The genetic makeup of transfused blood never changes as it remains that of the donor. The recipient’s body will gradually remove and replace the donor’s cells with its own, maintaining the recipient’s genetic identity. But what happens when tainted blood acts as an epigenetic bioreactor during the replenishment period? What happens when spike proteins are transferred into the recipient’s body? And what happens when donor bloods are biotechnologically tainted by CRISPR-Cas9 tools? These uncomfortable questions are rarely answered in an era of manufactured pandemics.
The ancient world however had viewed blood as the inviolable life force of a person or creature. The consumption of blood was prohibited in the Bible and it remains one of only three Jewish dietary laws that are applicable to Christians (Acts 15:29).
“Only be sure that you do not eat the blood, for the blood is the life, and you shall not eat the life with the flesh.” (Deuteronomy 12:23).
“For the life of a creature is in the blood… it is the blood that makes atonement for one’s life.” (Leviticus 17:11).
The first recorded murder in the Bible – that of Cain slaying his brother Abel – has an intriguing reference to blood.
“What have you done? The voice of your brother’s blood is crying out to Me from the ground. (Genesis 4:10).
What an otherwise odd statement! Does blood carry the “voice” of an aggrieved soul, even after death?
GM-tainted Food
The human body and soul today are reeling under relentless epigenetic warfare. While IQ scores and sperm counts are dropping dramatically across the world, a surge in “sudden and unexpected” deaths and turbocharged terminal ailments are constantly “baffling” experts. The human epigenetic mechanism seems to be working on steroids.
Food constitutes one of these epigenetic steroids. We are, after all, not only what we eat but “what our grandmothers ate”! This is called nutritional epigenetics. If natural sources of food can have generational consequences, how will artificially created genetically modified organisms (“GMOs”) affect our bodies and minds?
Despite endless calls for caution, the genetically modified (“GM”) food juggernaut is simply unstoppable. There is even a proposal to insert genetic barcodes into our already-tainted food chain. As Tracy Thurman wrote in the Activist Post:
