by Fed Up Texas Chick, The Tenpenny Report:
On Valentine’s Day, something happened in France that didn’t get a whole lot of attention. The country’s National Assembly passed a law making resistance to “mRNA treatment” a criminal offense. Anyone who advises against mRNA medical treatments could face three years in prison and/or fines of €45,000.
It sounds surreal, but it is indeed very real. And very draconian. Read it for yourself here.
Opponents of the law described it as “repression of medical dissent”, ”anti-science” and “pushing France ever further in the direction of totalitarianism”.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Proponents of the law say it is aimed at fighting “sectarian excesses” – people they call “pseudo-therapists” who are going against the New World Order (NOW) recommendations. It’s amazing how it all started with ‘two weeks to stop the spread’, and how it quickly morphed into long-term lockdowns, isolation. masks and pseudo vaccines. Sectarian excess now equates to a doctor who recommends an alternative to mRNA jabs or simply a person who chooses a different path.
Bills like these are typically a long time in the making, as the Deep State continues behind the scenes to chip away at our sovereignty. This bill is no different, first proposed in 2022 following a report from an arm of the French government saying the sectarian excesses were getting out of control. 2022, huh? Maybe that’s because adverse events from these jabs were front and center around that time, and people started becoming painfully aware that something wasn’t right. As always, the French government says they’re putting this law in place for the good of the people, to protect them from becoming victims of anti-vaxxing pseudo-therapists. Playbook known.
The law received very little to no recognition in the mainstream media, but it is receiving honorable mention in alternative media outlets, who point out that amongst all the typical flowery wording about protecting health and keeping citizens safe, Article 4 of the new law is particularly damning. Once deleted, but reinstated in this round, it is now a criminal offense to “request to stop or refrain from therapeutic or prophylactic medical treatment” as well as “the request to use practices that are presented as therapeutic or prophylactic ”. Bye bye ivermectin, vitamin D and all the rest of it…except mRNA technology and the likes of Paxlovid.
Countries are run by a world government, and they’ve been working on this for quite some time. The Lancet featured an article in 2021, defending the Austrian Government for a bill that imposed mandatory COVID-19 vaccination requirement for all its residents. Their argument is that many nations were doing so. Greece imposed fines on citizens over age 60 who did not get the COVID jab. Other nations like Brazil, Canada, Italy, and Indonesia enacted similar measures, so the three authors, all UK lawyers, used the strength in numbers argument.
The authors criticized Sajid Javid, the UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, for saying that mandates were unethical. These authors say that one of the main reasons people resist such mandates is because they could decrease health-care staffing levels. No, not because it might kill you or permanently damage your health, not for religious reasons, but because we’re all worried about staffing levels.
They go on to say that many of us, like Javid apparently, presume mandatory vaccination violates human rights. Of course, these three legal eagles proceed to tell us our view is mistaken, and lay out an extensive legal analysis on why mandatory vaccination is both legal and constitutional. In an ends-justify-the-means approach, they say that human rights law is compatible with mandatory vaccination because the state (the Deep State?) has a duty to adopt mandatory vaccination for the public good. “Restrictions on liberty can be justified if they prevent harm to others.” No more needs to be said. It starts with restrictions on liberty and ends with criminal punishment if you dare to speak out or act out against the restrictions when the state takes it too far.
What happened in Florida?
Thank goodness Florida’s surgeon general, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, does not live in France. Otherwise, he would likely be deemed a criminal for saying what he said in early January when he called on healthcare providers to halt the use of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Ladapo stated that the health risks had been grossly underreported. Ladapo has long been a voice of reason during the plandemic; he was one of the first in
Read More @ TheTenpennyReport.com
