by Mark Crispin Miller, News from Underground:
Will she endorse “Joe Biden,” as the Democrats are hoping? And might she also somehow aid Big Pharma, like her (apparent) boyfriend, Kansas City Chiefs tight end and very-high-paid Pfizer shill?
In their desperation to pump life (or something like it) into the zombie project of keeping Old “Joe Biden” in the White House, Democrats are very busy lobbying Taylor Swift, to get her to endorse him (as she did in 2020), and otherwise help out (as with getting Swifties registered to vote). That’s the plan according to the New York Times—and to the Republicans, who have been warning zealously that such a “psy-op” is definitely in the works.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
January 29, 2024
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/29/us/politics/biden-trump-election-taylor-swift.html
Let’s step back for a moment from that partisan scenario, and note what UFC veteran Paige VanZant said recently about the romance (if any) between Swift and Kelce. Based on what she knows about the propaganda use of football champions and their (seeming?) love lives, VanZant speculated that the Taylor/Kelce partnership may be a bold commercial enterprise, to benefit the NFL, and so on:
https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1752042447088017527
Now, if VanZant is right about the “100%” fakery of that high-profile love affair, is it irrational to wonder if its purpose is so narrowly commercial? Maybe it is meant to benefit the Democrats—if not by actually enabling them to win the next election (it’s hard to picture the incumbent really winning one), then by providing a faux-explanation for why “Biden” “won” (again). No matter how abundant and precise the evidence of fraud, the propaganda choristers can just say “Taylor Swift endorsed him! So of course he won!”—and, in this world of cognitive decline (it’s not just “Biden,” after all, but “our free press” and academia that are no longer capable of reason), that nitwit talking point may be enough.
Or maybe, if that “romance” isn’t real, its propaganda purpose is not partisan, or only partisan, but has to do with the vast psy-op that’s been raging for the last four years, and that both parties (Donald Trump included) have supported. Could it be, in other words, that Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce have some sort of bio-fascist function? After all, while Kelce’s heart (allegedly) belongs to Taylor Swift, his soul belongs to Pfizer, which paid him a reported $20 million to make this criminal commercial, and otherwise perform as Pfizer’s anti-Aaron-Rodgers.
But that’s him, not her, you may rightly say; and, in fact, I wasn’t going to post about those two, since Swift dispensed with all the “COVID measures” at the outset of her Eras Tour, much to the dismay of her Covidian fans (scroll down). Last night, however, I came across this loony article in MedPageToday—Big Pharma’s Pravda, in which every word is at the service of the medical colossus. While it could merely be one doc’s impartial nod to Taylor Swift, its argument is so ridiculous that maybe we should not rule out the possibility that she may have some propaganda role to play in concert (so to speak) with Travis Kelce’s profitable pro-“vax” theatrics.
Who knows for sure? I don’t; but, by now, we should respect the fact that, when it comes to bio-fascist propaganda, anything is possible.
Read More @ markcrispinmiller.substack.com
