by Brian Shilhavy, Health Impact News:
“All wars are bankers’ wars” is a common fact known to many in the Alternative Media who understand that politicians are mere puppets to the world’s Globalists who control the finances of the world, and these Globalists who control the banking industry as well as the Billionaires on Wall Street and Silicon Valley, fund both sides of almost every war to maximize profits.
Think of professional sports in the U.S. for an analogy. When a major sports league has a championship game or series to determine which team is the “champion,” you have two cities and two teams with allegedly two different owners competing against each other to determine a “champion”.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Only one of those teams can claim to be the “champion” for that season out of all the other teams in that league.
But who profits no matter which team wins?
The bankers who own the banks where all the financial resources of every team resides. As long as the sports league is financially solid and growing their market, the bankers and investors profit, no matter which team is crowned “champion.”
So it is with war.
But since the start of the Russia – Ukraine war in 2022, we have seen some of the rules of warfare change. There appears to be a new rift appearing in the Global Banking network, as the Western Banking system based out London, France, Switzerland and New York, cut off Russia from utilizing their banking network by excluding them from the worldwide SWIFT banking system to move money globally.
The Western Banking system, which is led primarily by the Jewish Rothschild family in Europe, and the Jewish Rockefeller family in the U.S., has been failing miserably since 2019, and only was able to stay on life support due to COVID-19, which allowed the Federal Reserve to inject literally $trillions into the economy via the military (Operation Warp Speed) to fight the “unseen enemy”, COVID-19.
This has been the method the Globalists have used to keep their control over the world’s financial system since at least the early 1900s that led to World War I: just start a “war” and bankroll both sides to “fix” the financial system.
The “war” changed dynamics after the false flag event known as 9/11, where the enemy became “terrorists” instead of a single country or geopolitical location. It allowed the Globalists to use their massive financial resources to fund the main intelligence agencies, the CIA, Mossad, and MI6 to create these “terrorist groups”, mostly among Muslims.
This “war” has existed through today and has justified the United States keeping a military presence in occupied territories throughout the Middle East, such as Syria, Iraq, and many other places, which just happen to conveniently be areas of high petroleum production also.
The “war” started by these Globalists changed dynamics once again in 2020 with the “war” against the “unseen virus” that China and Donald Trump started.
It is, therefore, always prudent to take a step back anytime “war” breaks out, such as the most recent one that began in October in Gaza, and try to figure out what the Globalists’ purpose and end game might be.
I have been pondering this for the past few days, ever since the leader of Hezbollah, Hassan Nasrallah, failed to call for an all out war against Israel last Friday, as many had expected.
This had been the threat made to Israel if they chose to invade Gaza with ground forces, which they have now done, as they continue to bomb anything and everything in Gaza, including yesterday when Israel’s Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu stated that dropping a nuclear bomb on the Gaza Strip was an option for Israel and claimed there are no innocent civilians in the enclave. (Source.)
So why haven’t Hezbollah and Iran followed through on their threats?
I don’t know, and can only speculate. Did the U.S. buy off Iran and Hezbollah before the Hamas attacks happened, as is evidenced by the release of $billion of dollars to Iran just before the attacks?
Or are Iran and Hezbollah playing the long game, by not falling for the Israeli trap, and just standing by and waiting for Israel to implode by itself without a larger escalation of the war?
The latter is the opinion of Scott Ritter, the former US Marine Corps intelligence officer that now writes for RT.com. See:
The US and Hezbollah want the same thing from Israel-Hamas war – The “dueling” speeches of Hassan Nasrallah and Antony Blinken show both understand the Middle East escalation ladder
But there may be another piece to this puzzle that Pam Martens has uncovered and published in her column today at Wall Street on Parade, and her ongoing coverage of the Jeffrey Epstein lawsuits against Chase Bank, the largest bank in the U.S.
While examining court documents for the most recent proposed settlement in a class action lawsuit against Chase Bank, who funded the Epstein worldwide pedophile network, she noticed that one of the plaintiffs, former Epstein victim Sarah Ransome, was challenging the settlement and is appearing in court in New York later this week. As a former Epstein victim, Ransome has cut deals before to prevent her from testifying, and regretted it.
Martens discovered that a federal marshal has now been ordered to be present at this hearing, something that no other media outlet has reported yet.
There are extremely strange things happening in a very high-profile federal court case in Manhattan where the largest bank in the United States, JPMorgan Chase, stands accused by victims of facilitating Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring that sexually abused minors as the bank doled out $40,000 to $80,000 a month in hard cash for more than a decade without filing the legally required Suspicious Activity Reports.
Further implicating the bank is the fact, documented by internal emails, that executives and staff of JPMorgan Chase were visitors to Epstein’s Manhattan mansion where rapes and sexual assaults of minors have been alleged by victims as occurring. (See our report: A JPMorgan Court Filing Shows Another Bank Exec Visited Jeffrey Epstein’s Sex-Trafficking Residences 13 Times – Two More Times than Jes Staley.)
A recent entry on the docket of the case shows that a federal marshal has now been ordered to be present for the Fairness Hearing this Thursday, November 9, at 4 p.m. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Needing an armed federal marshal for a hearing involving the largest bank in the United States; its lawyers from Big Law firm WilmerHale; and plaintiffs’ high-profile attorney, David Boies – seems like something that might rouse the curiosity of reporters at expensive media real estate in Manhattan. But adding to the aura of strangeness surrounding the case is the fact that neither the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal – two newspapers that had previously been actively reporting on the case – have failed to share this latest intrigue with their readers.
The likely reason the federal marshal has been summoned for the hearing is that David Boies has taken the questionable action of making public on the court docket an exhibit showing what purports to be 105 pages of personal emails sent by a Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking victim, Sarah Ransome. The final email states this:
“David and Demon – You’ve made the biggest mistake crossing me. You’ve underestimated me and I’m coming for you. Sarah Ransome”
Throughout the series of emails, Ransome refers to Jamie Dimon, Chairman and CEO of JPMorgan Chase, as “Demon” instead of Dimon. (Given the five felony counts and frauds that Dimon has presided over at the bank, one might be forgiven for selecting an unpleasant moniker for the bank’s top honcho.)
In an email dated October 24, 2023 to leaders of countries in the Middle East, Ransome writes this:
“My bad choices because life dealt me a rather rough hand doesn’t change the fact that I was raped repeatedly and trafficked by Epstein, no matter how hard the U.S. and Israeli Administration deflect that they indeed have broken the Geneva Convention and have been committing war crimes globally for decades…We all know that the material Epstein filmed for both governments has been used to broker deals in their favour for years.”
(Source.)
Who is Sarah Ransome?
Sarah Ransome is a former victim of Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, and has already appeared in other court trials, including Ghislaine Maxwell’s. She claims to have copies of secret sex tapes recorded by Epstein that implicate the rich and powerful.
She is well-known to the Corporate Media and has appeared in many interviews with her claims. The only name she has revealed so far is Attorney Alan Dershowitz, who has vehemently denied the accusations. She sued Dershowitz for defamation for calling her a “liar”, and the two settled out of court.
Read More @ HealthImpactNews.com
