by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World, 2nd Smartest Guy in the World:
This Substack has chronicled the illegal war on PSYOP-19 early treatment therapies by the very perpetrators of the “pandemic,” and their associated criminal mandates. It is no surprise that the most vilified early treatment repurposed drug Ivermectin has also been by far the most effective:
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
The reason that the captured FDA along with their partners-in-crime the CDC, WHO, UN, WEF, CFR, DoD, Pentagon, CIA, the illegitimate Federal government, Rockefeller and Gates “nonprofits,” et al. have targeted Ivermectin is threefold: it is exceptionally effective as an early C-19 treatment, mass administration would have resulted in plummeting global (turbo) cancer rates, and this wonder drug attenuates and reverses the slow kill bioweapon DEATHVAX™ damage.
A landmark lawsuit filed against the FDA by doctors Mary Talley Bowden, Paul Marik, and Robert Apter was heard in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday. Part of this lawsuit against the FDA was specific to fraudulent and illicit claims made by the agency against Ivermectin.
Basically, the FDA lawyer is now making mendacious claims that it did not prevent doctors from prescribing off-label Ivermectin, and yet they put tremendous pressure on the entire medical establishment and pharmacists to under no circumstances prescribe this drug. The FDA even tweeted their propaganda to put further pressure on doctors, illegally subverted with the Hippocratic Oath in plain sight, and were harming those they claim to protect with their social media posts:
After decades of committing various fraud on behalf of their BigPharma owners, the FDA’s true reason for existing was fully revealed during PSYOP-19. And now the FDA’s lawyer is most conveniently invoking ‘Sovereign Immunity:’
If the FDA is legally (under color of law, and certainly not constitutionally) granted the right to offer general, more at sweeping, medical advice, then how would that not interfere with the doctor patient relationship? In other words, there is no room for an unconstitutional Federal government agency to meddle in the intimate and individualized practice of doctoring.
Read More @ 2ndSmartestGuyintheWorld.com