by Susan Duclos, All News Pipeline:
I have seen a number of recent stories that have led me to the conclusion that at least half of Americans have been so brainwashed and programmed into “woke” ideology, that they quite literally cannot tell fact from fiction.
For example, we hear so much about how “disinformation” should not be considered “free speech,” and free speech is a “thorny” issue from the very people that tells us men can be women (disinformation), have periods and babies (disinformation), are not physically stronger than women so should be allowed in women’s sports (disinformation), and that there are more than two genders (disinformation).
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Some call it misinformation, others call it disinformation, but they are both the same thing, and “Democrats are the biggest disinformation peddlers of them all.”
Why do I point to Democrats? It isn’t because I am conservative.
It is because you will not find a conservative that thinks a man can be a woman just because he “identifies” as one. You won’t find a conservative saying women “don’t own” periods and womanhood.”
You certainly won’t find a conservative that looks at the picture above, or the video below, and thinks, “oh how pretty, I am going to run right out and buy some Maybelline lipstick!!!!”
Below is just one of the many Maybelline Instagram ads using bearded men.
Not only has Maybelline ignored the tens of billions of dollars other companies, such as Anheuser Busch, lost by trying to replace women with men pretending to be women in their advertising, but they now think that appealing to less than 1% of the population, while alienating the people who wear makeup the most, is somehow a good idea.
Which brings me to a story I shared in the comment section on Sunday, but which truly requires its own space because it gets to the heart of the battle between good and evil that we are facing in America today.
CRAZY SURROUNDS US….
Woke snowflake researchers at Oregon State University claim they were “traumatized,” by answers given by engineering and computer science students to a LGBTQ survey, which included 24% of those taking the survey mocking the questions, and the idea of the survey itself.
By the time the answers were registered and the researchers said “time had to be taken off the project to heal from traumatic harm,” because the answers “had a profound impact on morale and mental health,” they changed the entire focus of the study.
Let us take a look at what answers were so shocking an “fascist” that the resulting paper was titled ” Attack Helicopters and White Supremacy: Interpreting Malicious Responses to an Online Questionnaire about Transgender Undergraduate Engineering and Computer Science Student Experiences.”
By the way, as you’ll see by the answers shown below, that title in and of itself, is disinformation.
• When the students were asked what gender they were, “12 respondents (24%) indicated their gender as being related to a helicopter or aircraft” ranging from an “Apache Attack Helicopter” to a “V22 osprey.”
• In the section declaring one’s disabilities, responses ranged from claiming to be “illiterate” to lamenting “My country is run by communists,” or even declaring that identifying as transgender is a disability in itself due to “the inability to come to terms with biological reality.”
• Under racial and ethnic identities they said, “I’m an ethnic gift card,” and for disability the answer was “I don’t have enough gift cards.”
• Other responses to questions about identity rejected the researchers’ project entirely, with answers such as “My skin color is not important,” “Come on man, these questions are stupid. Everyone is a grab bag of genetics from all over the world,” and “What else do you want to know? What I ate for breakfast. [T]his question is unnecessary.”
The research team declared that the mockery they received “had a profound impact on morale and mental health,” particularly for one transgender researcher who was “already in therapy for anxiety and depression regarding online anti-trans rhetoric.” The paper claimed that “managing the study’s data collection caused significant personal distress, and time had to be taken off the project to heal from traumatic harm” of having to read students’ responses in the survey.
Rather than understanding the mockery from the students was based on the ridiculousness of the LGBTQ survey itself being given to Engineering and Computer Science students, who deal in numbers and facts, not disinformation, the researchers labeled the answers as “malicious responses.”
The kicker:
The researchers appeared surprised that their own findings had been “ultimately rejected” by many academic journals, leaving them with the impression that their research decrying so-called fascism in academia is viewed by some as “irrelevant to engineering education, if not alarmist.”
I’ll admit to being surprised as well as academic journals are usually run by people very much like the snowflake researchers, yet their conclusions were rejected nonetheless.
I won’t look a gift horse in the mouth.
Read More @ AllNewsPipeline.com
