by Rhoda Wilson, Expose News:
As has been carefully documented, under cover of the “virus/vaccine” narrative, the Global Elite is implementing long-planned and profound changes to 200 areas of human life.
In essence, as documented elsewhere – see ‘We Are Being Smashed Politically, Economically, Medically and Technologically by the Elite’s “Great Reset”: Why? How Do We Fight Back Effectively?’ – this program will kill off a substantial proportion of humanity, imprison those left alive as transhuman slaves in their “smart cities” subject to their Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies (including 5G, digital ID, CBDCs, geofencing, AI policing and a robotised workforce), enclose the Commons forever and transfer all wealth to Elite hands.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Needless to say, with some people already resisting and more people likely to perceive the truth of what is happening and join the resistance with the passage of time, policing the imposition of this program will be a critical factor in ensuring its success.
As indicated then, just one area in which profound change will take place is policing. Future policing will be done by a smaller number of militarily-equipped police, transhuman police and technocratic police supported by corporate private security technology.
In this article, I will briefly outline the key changes to policing, in these three distinct categories, and also explain why these changes must be resisted and how we can do this most effectively.
Fewer and Militarised Police
Reflecting a longer-term trend, in 2019 the International Association of Chiefs of Police reported that “Law enforcement agencies across the United States are struggling to recruit and hire police officers.” While police killings of innocent civilians – see ‘Mapping Police Violence’ and ‘Not just “a few bad apples”: US police kill civilians at much higher rates than other countries’ – failed to rate a mention in the report, it did at least acknowledge “scrutiny of the police, cellphone recordings of interactions between the police and public, media coverage, and popular entertainment portrayals of police have led many young people to view police differently than their parents may have.” See ‘The State of Recruitment: A Crisis for Law Enforcement’.
In late 2021, two years into policing the pandemic, US police reported a substantially increased rate of retirement and resignation among police officers, with more than five times as many police leaving the New York Police Department in 2021 as left in 2020. According to the report: “In the wake of a spasmodic year of protests and pandemic, plus an aftermath of violent crime, the profession may be fast approaching a generational and possibly historic reckoning.” See ‘Law enforcement faces unprecedented challenges in hiring and keeping recruits’.
On the other side of the world, where the Victoria Police had suffered an image-battering following their violent policing of protests against covid lockdown measures – see ‘Australia: Harsh Police Response During Covid-19’ – the situation was the same: “Victoria Police is facing a staffing crisis with an extra 1,500 frontline officers needed, secret modelling has warned.” See ‘Secret Report Reveals Victoria Police Facing a Staffing Crisis’.
Of course, other police forces around the world suffered image batterings in response to their violent response to those protesting “pandemic” lockdowns and other restrictions. See, for example, ‘Serbia: Violent police crackdown against COVID-19 lockdown protesters must stop’.
But on top of long-standing issues in relation to police numbers exacerbated by political direction of policing behaviour while enforcing “pandemic” lockdown measures, it is clear that the number of serving police has been reduced throughout the past three years by using two additional mechanisms: In many places, forcing those who resisted the “kill shot” to resign from service – see, for example, ‘Victoria Police facing exodus due to draconian Covid rules’ – and, everywhere, by killing off a proportion of the police who were mandated to take the shot – which will continue to have impact in the years ahead.
Apart from this, the damaged reputation police suffered as a result of their role in enforcing the Elite program against those people willing to non-violently protest the violation of their constitutional and human rights, has meant that the conscience-based resignation rate of police has risen – see, for example, ‘Conscientious Resignation of Police Officer in Australia’ – while recruitment has suffered in many places.
Separately from this, other resignations and retirements have probably occurred following official interference to thwart conscientious police officers asked or attempting to investigate deaths from covid injections – see one initiative by New Zealand doctors to have the issue investigated (‘Deaths Following C-19 Vaccination’) which ran into government obstruction (‘Jacinda Ardern Left Reeling As New Zealand Police Look at Investigating COVID Jab Deaths’) and a Canadian officer punished for conducting an investigation (‘Ottawa police officer charged for examining COVID-19 vaccine deaths’). Of course, any attempts to expose injection deaths among police colleagues have no doubt been “discouraged” despite evidence of their occurrence.
In any case, two critical questions to ask are these: Were government policies that led to police violence during the pandemic designed to provoke public anger and induce police retirements and resignations as ways of reducing police numbers easily? And was official interference in police decisions about whether or not to investigate injection deaths partly designed to disenchant conscientious officers and induce further resignation/retirements?
Why would governments do this? Could it be part of a plan to facilitate the transformation of how policing is conducted? After all, the World Economic Forum has been clear about the Elite intention to robotise the workforce, with more than half of human workers projected to be replaced by robots within a few years. See ‘Machines Will Do More Tasks Than Humans by 2025 but Robot Revolution Will Still Create 58 Million Net New Jobs in Next Five Years’.
So why should we expect police to be forced out of the workforce, one way or another, at a lesser rate than elsewhere?
Moreover, there is an additional problem: Any human police officer with a reasonably “normal” psychological profile has a conscience. And these will not serve well in enforcing the coming technocratic order.
