Evidence ‘Mass Murder’ Is The Official Policy Of The United States Government, Using Prohibited Bioweapons To Injure And Kill, Not Regulated Medicinal Products Designed To Protect And Heal

    0
    325

    by Katherine Watt, All News Pipeline:

    (ANP: In the only video at the bottom of this story is an excellent new interview of researcher and medical trial expert Sasha Latypova by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the founder of Children’s Health Defense, on the coup d’état against America that has been carried out by the medical and pharmaceutical industries, politicians, media, deep state and Pentagon with this video discussing America’s Militarized Healthcare, which this story is largely based upon.)

    TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

    Several months ago, while thinking about Brook Jackson’s case, I started developing some argument frameworks to help plaintiffs, attorneys and judges get past some of the biggest legal obstacles and move closer to justice for the Covid-19 crimes and criminals. 

    I published one such exploration in November.

    Nov. 16, 2022 – Some thinking about tampering with evidence and spoliation 

    …the men and women doing these things are not acting in their official capacities or under color of legal authority but are rogue actors…. 

    Trump, Biden, Azar, Becerra, Fauci, Birx, Walensky, etc [have been] impersonating federal officials (18 USC 912).

    We need plaintiffs, fact patterns and claims that drive a legal wedge to separate the legitimate US Government and the people still operating under the US Constitution and legitimate federal laws, from the infiltrated/co-opted illegitimate US Government and the embedded agents operating as if the US Constitution has been suspended, under federal pseudo-laws through the fraudulent national emergency and public health framework. 

    Summarized: we need to get the US Gov in a position where it must either admit or deny that fraud + mass murder is the official, authorized policy of the US Gov., such that the identifiable people who are running the programs have recourse to legal defense services provided by the US Department of Justice, or get cut loose, declared rogue and are then opened to criminal prosecution in their personal capacities

    I explored this framing a bit more in January:

    Jan. 16, 2023 – Dual-use government officials of concern 

    …I’m most interested in developing and supporting cases that force government defendants and defense counsel to first, admit that the evidence (the record of their public acts and documents) conclusively shows they’ve launched a covert war with their people, which is becoming widely seen and understood.

    The government attorneys would then be compelled to choose between two defenses:

    – The war on the world is legal and the use of bioweapons to carry out official, authorized duties and orders to maim and kill billions of people, is justified and endorsed by the US government as an institution. 

    – The war is illegal, such that the official government acts undertaken by named defendants, to conduct the war, have been done without proper authority, by rogue actors, who can and will be removed from power and tried for their war crimes. 

    To the extent the Department of Justice responded to a criminal prosecution of Kadlec, Azar, Gruber and Hinton by using the second argument, the war criminals would be subject to prosecution in their personal capacity, without recourse to sovereign, legislative, administrative or other immunities.

    They would be cut loose from the government, and legally construed as people who committed the war crimes outside their official capacities, while impersonating federal officials, or while serving as agents of foreign invaders or occupiers. 

    The advantage offered by cutting the war criminals loose, is that it would leave the core governing institutions (legislatures, courts and executives) and the US Constitution intact…

    Read More @ AllNewsPipeline.com