PREPPING A NARRATIVE? THAT “OBJECT” SHOOTDOWN IN ALASKA

    0
    372

    by Joseph P. Farrell, Giza Death Star:

    By now most of you have heard that the Bai-Den Jo misadministration of the USSA has shot down … well, a “something” over Alaska, and that whole Chinese balloon circus-and-hysteria-fest of a couple of weeks ago just became a lot more interesting, and, oh, by the way, a Russian satellite whose precise purpose and mission was never known to anyone in the West just exploded in orbit. Other than that, there’s nothing going on.  Pardon me while I (cough hack wheeze)…

    TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

    All of this comes courtesy of some articles shared by E.E., and while I don’t intend to talk about all of them, they all do form some interest context and backdrop for what I do want to talk about, namely, the USSA’s shoot down of a “something” over Alaska.

    So first of all, here are E.E.’s articles:

    ‘Very Disturbing Possibility’ US Manufacturing Helped Build Chinese Spy Balloon, Sen. Hawley Says

    China Balloon Had Western-Made Parts With English Writing, Lawmakers Told

    Secretive Russian Satellite Breaks Apart In Orbit, Creating Debris Cloud

    Now all of this is, I contend, very interesting context and backdrop to the following story, also shared by E.E.:

    What’s Known So Far About The “Cylindrical & Silverish Gray” Object Downed Over Alaska

    Interestingly enough, the same story receives a slightly different take from Russia’s online magazine, Sputnik, and again we’re grateful to E.E. for bringing it to our attention:

    US v. UFOs: What’s Known So Far About the Car-Sized Object Downed Over Frozen Alaska Waters?

    Now note something carefully: none of the articles are saying exactly what the object was. There is speculation that it was a balloon. But according to the Zero Hedge article, all we know about it is the following:

    What has become clear is that Biden gave the order to shoot it down before knowing who owned it or where it came from, or whether it was state-owned or perhaps owned by a corporation. And of course the question remains: was this another Chinese spy balloon? Or was it a weather research balloon just downed over Alaska?

    According to details from White House and Pentagon briefings on Friday, including descriptions from senior officials, here’s what’s known at this point:

    • It flew at 40,000 feet
    • Deemed a safety threat to civilian aircraft
    • Unknown origin or ownership
    • Cylindrical and silverish gray
    • Roughly the size of a car
    • Smaller than the Chinese ‘spy’ balloon shot down last Satursday
    • Object not maneuverable or propelled
    • Shot down by US F-22 with sidewinder missile

    Ok, so the demented “Biden” gave an order to shoot down something before it was even known what it was. I have no problem believing that a bare minimum of information was communicated to the alleged “Biden” and that he may have mumbled something vaguely resembling an answer or permission, or that we’re being told he did when he really didn’t. At this stage, the whole thing in the White (out)House looks like theater, so it wouldn’t surprise me the whole show is being run by bureaucrats.  In any case, someone somewhere probably had at least some idea of what it was.

    What also interesting to note here is that there appears to be an attempt to recover the whatever-it-was:

    Recovery efforts utilizing military planes and helicopters in the far northeast arctic region of Alaska continue, where on Friday an unidentified object was shot down by F-22 jets.

    There are a number of other odd anomalies. For example, it supposedly was flying at 40,000 feet, was not maneuverable, was roughly the size of a car, and was deemed “a safety threat to aircraft”.  Assuming the map accompanying the article to be an accurate estimation of where the shoot down occurred, I admit I’m hard-pressed to picture a lot of civilian aircraft flying in the area, commercial or otherwise.   And one more thing: it was shot down with a missile, not cannon fire, which means the military might not have thought the object was a mere balloon.

    Read More @ GizaDeathStar.com