by Peter Breggin MD & Ginger Breggin, America Outloud:
One of the most esteemed physicians in the health freedom movement is now calling for the complete ban of the mRNA platform for vaccines and treatments based on the damaging effects of the vaccines that are killing patients around the world.1
For the first time in medicine, pathologists are discovering simultaneous conditions of widespread brain damage and heart damage from capillary thrombosis (clotting) and micro vessel vasculitis (inflammation).
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
A recent speech in Greece by physician Sucharit Bhakdi revealed that “pathologists have now found that in the brain of deceased people after vaccination, for the first time, there are capillary thrombosis and micro vessel ” vasculitis occurring in many, many parts of the brain. It’s the same patient. This has never been described in textbooks. This is pathognomonic for vaccination, and lo and behold, while they found those lesions, they found the spike protein of this damn virus…. around these vessels, they found … brain cells, dying brain cells. That’s number one. They are dying. Imagine that your brain cells in different parts of the brain are dying. You are losing something forever, something that was given to you and that can never be returned to you.”
Dr. Bhakdi further revealed that the same patients who had this multifocal encephalitis also had myocarditis and stated, “this does not exist in the medical literature. You never have multifocal encephalitis and myocarditis. Only after vaccination…” He went on to reveal the smallest blood vessels in the heart tissue of the patient were “spiked”– damaged from the vaccines.
Pathologists have now looked at more than 50 autopsies of vaccinated patients and have found “alterations in the brain and heart together in more than 70 percent of the dead, and this is something so horrifying,” said Dr. Bhakdi.
mRNA Vaccines Must be Stopped
“Every mRNA vaccine is, in fact, a danger and must be stopped, and this is the message that we want to leave here in Athens with you to spread…” said Dr. Bhakdi.2
The gravity of his message cannot be overemphasized.
One portion of Dr. Bhakdi’s message was that the behaviors and personality of persons could begin to change as their brains are damaged by the micro clotting and inflammation in the brain capillaries. Other observers are noticing personality changes in family members, coworkers, friends, and community members.
Personality Changes?
Comments are swirling around the internet and in conversations about whether family and friends they love have been emotionally changed by their COVID vaccines. People say, in some cases, that loved ones have become distant, less connected with life, withdrawn, and flattened in response. Dr. Naomi Wolf, one of the most eloquent and astute cultural observers, has written:
“Crowds themselves were altered. Young adults were limping…. Men and women in their forties and fifties looked as if they had been recently healthy and were now moving like eighty-year-olds. People of vast numbers of all ages walked as if it was hurting them to move. Even teenagers and older children moved like zombies or robots — drifting with seemingly no energy to spare. Smaller children did not squirm or race around. They sat vacantly on park benches or in restaurants. Or they drifted like little wraiths beside their parents, focused on nothing. What happened? What happened to humanity?3
Dr. Naomi Wolf reminds us of the information so far accumulated about the material that carries the specific mRNA vaccine into the body. The mRNA platform is like an envelope into which different treatment substances can be inserted. The mRNA must be enveloped in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). in order to protect it and enable it to pierce protective barriers in the body to deliver its payload. The lipid nanoparticles enable any encased substance to slip by the body’s natural defenses into normally protected spaces such as a growing fetus, the human brain, and other vulnerable body regions. Documentation is being accumulated of the damage being caused by the lipid nanoparticles in bypassing protective systems.4,5,6,7
Physical Brain Damage can Cause Profound Behavioral Changes
The kind of almost numbed or stunned behavior described by Dr. Wolf, coupled with apathy or a kind of aura of exhaustion, can be caused by physical trauma to the brain, like traumatic brain injury, electroshock treatment (ECT), or a toxic substance. Surgical damage from psychosurgery, so-called lobotomy, where previously healthy brain tissue is damaged by cutting or cauterization, can have the same effect. If the patient was labeled behaviorally disruptive, the flat affect or emotional apathy is often labeled as “improvement” by his or her doctors.
Dr. Breggin described this effect further in a medical book and a letter to the Editor published in the American Journal of Psychiatry, in August 1983.8,9 He describes this same kind of “flattening, emotionally stunted” effect of psychosurgery and lobotomy.10 The pro-lobotomy physician P. Tow reported, “although post lobotomy [sic] patients may perform well on standard, structured tests, they fail miserably on tests requiring the display of initiative, autonomy, flexibility, or independent judgment and planning. They also lose their emotional sensitivity, capacity to empathize, and sense of self….” Dr. Tow referred to these patients as “more simple.”11
In the 1970s, Dr. Breggin singlehandedly took on the practitioners of psychosurgery and, after several years of a very public campaign to educate the public and officials, was able to stop almost all the practice.12 One of the most pivotal moments occurred when Dr. Breggin was called to testify as an expert witness in the psychosurgery legal case of Kaimowitz v. Department of Mental health for the State of Michigan.
Dr. Breggin reports on his website the events of the case:
Quote
In 1972 the State of Michigan and the Lafayette Clinic of Wayne State University began planning an experimental psychosurgery program for the control of violence, using “voluntary” inmates of the state hospital system. Gabe Kaimowitz, at the time a Michigan Legal Services lawyer, heard about the upcoming medical event, and intervened in the court on behalf of “John Doe” and two-dozen other state psychiatric inmates scheduled for eventual enrollment in the experimental program.
Comparing Blacks to Bulls
Ernst Rodin was the chief neurologist and the moving force behind the Lafayette Clinic’s psychosurgery project. In 1972, Rodin wrote a lengthy speech describing psychosurgery and castration as appropriate treatment for some of the violent behavior displayed in the riots that had raged in his city of Detroit. Rodin voiced doubts about doing psychosurgery without sterilization because with psychosurgery alone, “the now hopefully more placid dullard can inseminate other equally dull young females to produce further dull and aggressive offspring.”
Rodin argued that children of limited intelligence tend to become violent when they are treated as equals. He wanted them brought up in an “authoritarian lifestyle” and declared that many of them, like aggressive bulls, should be turned into docile oxen by means of castration. In the neurologist’s own words, it was time to “get down to cold-blooded medical research dealing with individuals rather than masses.”
The Verdict
Kaimowitz invited me to testify as his medical expert, and during two days on the stand, I gave a history of state mental hospitals and psychosurgery. I wanted the three judges to understand that state mental hospitals are similar to Nazi concentration camps in how they suppress and humiliate their involuntary inmates, and I wanted to suggest the applicability of the Nuremberg Code.
The Nuremberg Code was initially written into the judges’ final opinion at the first War Crimes Tribunals in postwar Germany. It consists of ten principles for “permissible medical experiments.” The first principle states in part that the human subject “should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion” (Trials of War Criminals, 1946-1949, pp. 181-182).
The Nuremberg Code meant that inmates of concentration camps were not actually volunteers when they seemingly agreed to participate in medical experiments, such as being frozen in ice water. If they did acquiesce to these experiments, their consent was coerced by fear of other worse alternatives, such as torture or death in the gas chambers.
Read More @ AmericaOutloud.com
