The Phaserl


The Deep State’s Dominant Narratives and Authority Are Crumbling

by Charles Hugh Smith, Of Two Minds:

This is why the Deep State is fracturing: its narratives no longer align with the evidence.

As this chart from Google Trends illustrates, interest in the Deep State has increased dramatically in 2017. The term/topic has clearly moved from the specialist realm to the mainstream. I’ve been writing about the Deep State, and specifically, the fractures in the Deep State, for years.

Amusingly, now that “Progressives” have prostituted themselves to the Security Agencies and the Neocons/Neoliberals, they are busy denying the Deep State exists. For example, There is No Deep State (The New Yorker).

In this risible view, there is no Deep State “conspiracy” (the media’s favorite term of dismissal/ridicule), just a bunch of “good German” bureaucrats industriously doing the Empire’s essential work of undermining democracies that happen not to prostrate themselves at the feet of the Empire, murdering various civilians via drone strikes, surveilling the U.S. populace, planting bugs in new iPhones, issuing fake news while denouncing anything that questions the dominant narratives as “fake news,” arranging sweetheart deals with dictators and corporations, and so on.

The New Yorker is right about one thing–the Deep State is not a “conspiracy:” it is a vast machine of control that is largely impervious to the views or demands of elected representatives or the American people. The key to understanding this social-political-economic control is to grasp that control of the narratives, expertise and authority is control of everything. Allow me to illustrate how this works.

The typical politician has a busy daily schedule of speaking at the National Motherhood and Apple Pie Day celebration, listening to the “concerns” of important corporate constituents, attending a lunch campaign fundraiser, meeting with lobbyists and party committees, being briefed by senior staff, and so on.

Senior administrators share similarly crowded schedules, minus the fundraising but adding budget meetings, reviewing employee complaints and multiple meetings with senior managers and working groups.

Both senior elected officials and senior state administrators must rely on narratives, expertise and authority because they have insufficient time and experience to do original research and assessment.

Narratives create an instant context that “makes sense” of various data points and events. Narratives distill causal factors into an explanatory story with an implicit teleology–because of this and that, the future will be thus and so.

For example: because Iraq has weapons of mass destruction (WMD), the future promises the terrible likelihood (more than a possibility, given Iraqi deployment of poison gas in the Iraq-Iran War) that America or its allies will be devastated by Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. This teleology leads to the inescapable need to eliminate Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction by any means necessary, and remove the political will to use them by removing Iraq’s leader from power.

Politicos and senior administrators rely on expertise and authority as the basis of deciding whether something is accurate and actionable. Professional specialists are assumed to have the highest available levels of expertise, and their position in institutions that embody the highest authority give their conclusions the additional weight of being authoritative. The experts’ conclusion doesn’t just carry the weight of expertise, it has been reviewed by senior officials of the institution, and so it also carries the weight of institutional authority.

So when the C.I.A. briefing by its experts claims Iraq has WMD, and the briefing includes various threads of evidence that the institution declares definitive, who is a non-expert to challenge this conclusion and teleology? On what technical basis does the skeptic reject the expertise and authority of the institution?

We can now define the Deep State with some precision. The Deep State is fundamentally the public-private centralized nodes that collect, archive and curate dominant narratives and their supporting evidence, and disseminate these narratives (and their implicit teleologies) to the public via the media and to the state agencies via formal and informal inter-departmental communication channels.

By gaining control of the narratives, evidence, curation and teleology, each node concentrates power. the power to edit out whatever bits contradict the dominant narrative is the source of power, for once the contradictory evidence is buried or expunged, it ceases to exist.

For example, the contradictory evidence in the Pentagon Papers was buried by being declared Top Secret. The bureaucratic means to bury skeptical (i.e. heretical) views or evidence are many. Sending the authors to figurative Siberia is remarkably effective, as is burying the heretical claims in a veritable mountain of data that few if any will ever survey.

Curation is a critical factor in maintaining control of the narrative and thus of control; the evidence is constantly curated to best support the chosen narrative which in turn supports the desired teleology, which then sets the agenda and the end-game.

The senior apparatchiks of the old Soviet Union were masters of curation; when a Soviet leader fell from favor, he was literally excised from the picture–his image was erased from photos.

This is how narratives are adjusted to better fit the evidence. Thus the accusation that “the Russians hacked our election” has been tabled because it simply doesn’t align with any plausible evidence. That narrative has been replaced with variants, such as “the Russians hacked the Democratic National Committee.” Now that this claim has also been shown to be false, new variants are popping up weekly, with equally poor alignment with evidence.

Read More @

Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.

3 comments to The Deep State’s Dominant Narratives and Authority Are Crumbling

  • anon

    The term ‘Deep State’ is really just another term for the “Shadow Government” which sits BEHIND the official U.S. government, and is focused on growing government by more and more agencies, and more and more spending, especially military spending ~ the bill for which, ultimately just gets passed along as DEBT, to the American taxpayer (who picks up the tab). And behind it all ~ behind the CFR, behind CHATHAM HOUSE, behind the CIA, and MI6, behind Mossad, behind the CLUB OF ROME, TRILATERAL COMMISSION, BILDERBERG and all the rest of their FRONT GROUPS, sit the Western International Central BANKERS, like Rothschilds, & Rockefellers ~ but, predominantly “Jews”, who own the banks which comprise the Western BIS/IMF/World Bank/ECB/”Federal” “Reserve”/SWIFT payment system, like GOLDMAN SACHS, for example.

  • anon

    So, IF “The Deep State’s Dominant Narratives and Authority Are Crumbling” ~ I see that as a GOOD THING! (But, always remember, these sick psychopaths, sociopaths, child-molesters and child-ritual-murderers, as well as paranoid schizophrenics ~ these guys won’t just go quietly into the night. THAT IS REALLY THE PROBLEM, for Humanity, isn’t it? They simply can’t accept BANKRUPTCY (and just go away, and leave Humanity alone). No. They have to pass ALL THEIR CORPORATE LOSSES ON TO WE THE PEOPLE, while they bail themselves out with our and future (unborn generations of) Americans’ tax $$.

    “Too-Big-To-Fail” and “Too-Big-To-Jail” is just a euphemism for “Jew”-ish SUPREMACISM.

  • anon

    I’ve got an excellent idea. Why don’t we all do our level best, to HASTEN the END of the ‘Deep State’ control over the narrative and ‘Deep State’ “authority” ~ by EDUCATING OURSELVES, AND OTHERS, & by arming ourselves with HISTORICAL DOCUMENTED FACTS THAT NEGATE THEIR ENDLESS LIES!, & by supporting the REAL LEADERS in America, the TRUE AMERICAN HEROES WHO PROVIDE US WITH THE TRUTH ON A REGULAR BASIS!!! Wow. How about that?

    Why don’t we show some support for authors like Henry Makow, E. Michael Jones, PhD., Michael A. Hoffman II, David Duke, PhD., Mike S. King, (Juri Lina), Victor Thorn (RIP, 2016) and Deanna Spingola. You’ll definitely find the truth in their work.

    If you want the independent media to exist, you need to support the AUTHORS that CREATE it… economic censorship now under way

    Go straight to the comments section. Read the comments.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>