The Phaserl


How to Find the Best Offshore Banks

by Nick Giambruno, International Man:

It’s hard to think of a topic where following conventional wisdom is more dangerous.

That topic is banking.

The general public and most financial experts accept as absolute truth that putting your money in a domestic bank is safe and responsible. After all, the government insures your deposits, so if anything were to go wrong…

As a result, most people put more thought into the shoes they purchase than the bank they entrust with their life savings.

It’s a classic moral hazard. People are more likely to take risks when they don’t think they’ll bear the costs if and when something goes wrong. But, the truth is, if you make poor banking decisions, you may end up bearing some of the cost.

When you look at the facts, it becomes clear that choosing the right custodian for your life savings makes a difference—and it deserves some serious thought.

A False Sense of Security
In the US, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insures bank deposits. When a bank fails, the FDIC pays depositors up to $250,000. The FDIC has a reserve of around $30 billion for this purpose.

Now, $30 billion is a lot of money. But, considering the FDIC insures around $9 trillion in deposits, $30 billion is just a drop in the bucket. It’s actually less than half a penny for every dollar it supposedly insures.

Over two dozen US banks have deposits larger than the FDIC’s $30 billion reserve. One large bank failure and the FDIC itself would go bust. And, with many big US banks leveraged to the hilt, that isn’t an outlandish possibility.

Oddly, these facts don’t seem to shake the confidence the general public and most financial experts place in the banking system.

To make matters worse, governments around the world have already established a dangerous precedent: Whenever a government deems it necessary, it simply disregards deposit guarantees.

This happened a few years back in Cyprus, in the early days of the country’s financial crisis. Initially, the Cypriot government tried to dip its hands into bank accounts under the guaranteed amount.

I’d bet this trend is only beginning. We haven’t even made it through the coming attractions.

Placing confidence in any banking system simply because of a bankrupt government’s promise is dangerous. Follow conventional wisdom at your own peril.

Fortunately, in this day and age, geography doesn’t need to limit where you bank. Banking outside of your home country—where you can find much sounder governments, banking systems, and banks—is, in most ways, just as easy as banking with Bank of America.

The Solution
Setting up a bank account outside of your home country protects you from capital controls, lightning government seizures, bail-ins, other forms of confiscation, and any number of dirty government tricks.

In short, your savings in a foreign bank are largely safe from any madness in your home country.

Offshore banks offer another benefit: They are usually much safer and more conservatively run than banks in your home country… at least if you live in the US and many parts of Europe.

It’s hard to see any downside to placing some of your cash where it’s treated best. In the event your home government does something desperate or your domestic bank makes a losing bet, it could save you from financial ruin.

A few years ago, Doug Casey and I visited Cyprus in the wake of their banking collapse. We met with a number of astute Cypriots who saw the writing on the wall. They moved their money to safe foreign banks outside of the country before the bail-in and capital controls. It saved them from the harmful effects. We can learn a lot from their example.

Read More @

Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.

2 comments to How to Find the Best Offshore Banks

  • anon

    Off-shore banks are where the Western Anglo-JUDAIC “elites” park their ill-gotten DRUG $$, BAILOUT $$, and all other ILLICIT PROFIT$, all at U.S. taxpayer expense.

  • JMiller

    This article contains a number of errors. The FDIC insurance fund has $83.2 billion in it. Not $30 billion. The FDIC insures less than $7 trillion in deposits. Not $9 trillion. While the FDIC insurance fund is currently underfunded, the FDIC does have a line of credit with the U.S. Treasury. The FDIC insurance fund along with the credit line should easily be enough money to cover any payouts to insured depositors in any future banking crisis.

    The article states, “One large bank failure and the FDIC itself would go bust.”

    Not true. Not one penny of the FDIC insurance fund would even be used if any TBTF bank becomes insolvent. Why is that? Because if any of them fail, the FDIC has already stated that they would create a bridge bank and transfer the assets of the failed bank, which includes deposits, to the newly created and solvent bridge bank. This will protect depositors and allow the customers to still have access to the money and to conduct business as they normally would. So since there is no loss to insured depositors, there will be no need to pay anything out to them. This is why the FDIC’s goal is to have the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) amount be only 2% of the total of insured deposits which currently is only $140 billion. That 2% of insured deposits would have been enough to cover all the losses to the insurance fund in each of the previous banking crises.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>