The Phaserl


Eric Sprott’s Weekly Wrap Up – March 3, 2017

from Sprott Money:

This week, Eric discusses the current correction in metals prices as well as the prospect for higher interest rates ahead.

Our Ask The Expert interviewer Craig Hemke began his career in financial services in 1990 but retired in 2008 to focus on family and entrepreneurial opportunities. Since 2010, he has been the editor and publisher of the TF Metals Report found at, an online community for precious metal investors.

Click HERE to Listen

Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.

1 comment to Eric Sprott’s Weekly Wrap Up – March 3, 2017

  • rich

    We’ve snapped—-

    Snap Shouldn’t Have Been Allowed to Go Public Without Voting Rights

    Eleanor Bloxham
    Mar 03, 2017

    The late Goldman Sachs (gs, +0.73%) co-chair John Whitehead, who believed investors should have a vote for every share they hold, would not be happy if he saw the terms of Snap Inc.’s IPO. Underwritten by Goldman and Morgan Stanley (ms, +1.19%), the company made its debut on Wall Street Thursday, and offered common shares to the public without any voting rights.

    “One share, one vote” was a mantra Whitehead believed in—and in a September 2006 conversation with me on a video series my company produced , Whitehead told me that he thought Goldman and other investment banks should not underwrite shares that offer no or limited voting (like those that tech firms Google and Facebook have). Though always reluctant to directly criticize his alma mater, Whitehead said that shares without voting rights were destructive to capitalism’s very basis, and that given underwriters’ special role in the capital markets, they had a moral obligation to refuse the business.

    At Snap (snap, +10.66%), only pre-IPO investors who own private shares will be able to vote on company matters, allowing Snap to avoid certain public disclosures around pay and board structure that they might otherwise have to provide in voting materials, Skadden Arps attorney Thomas Ivey told me. In addition, Snap, with less than $1 billion in revenues, filed as an emerging company under the JOBS Act, which will allow Snap to avoid requirements related to internal controls over its financial reporting.

    One entity created under Dodd-Frank to advise the SEC on regulation is the Investor Advisory Committee (IAC). That committee will be meeting Thursday with plans to review the implications of shares with unequal—and no—voting rights, like Snap. Ken Bertsch, executive director of the Council of Institutional Investors, with over 120 pension and other institutional investor members representing over $3 trillion, is scheduled to provide testimony before the IAC at its meeting. I caught up with him yesterday to get a preview.

    While dual-class shares with limited voting were a race to the bottom, Bertsch says the Snap IPO with no voting shares may mean “we have now hit bottom.” Bertsch says Snap, although public, can now operate pretty much like a private company. Therefore, he argues Snap shouldn’t be allowed in indices of public companies that investors invest in, like those produced by S&P, FTSE Russell, and MSCI.

    Clearly Congress and the SEC have been asleep at the switch in allowing this. So, too, has been the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), which allowed the listing. Bertsch told me he is worried that the IPO will infect other markets beyond the NYSE and NASDAQ, which he says next to the Netherlands, have the lowest standards in the world. He is aware of rumblings in Singapore and Hong Kong that could signal a worldwide deterioration, as those two might now begin to allow dual-class offerings. It is concerning to think that companies can call themselves public, but lack the accountability that public company status should require.

    Wilson Sonsini attorney David Berger will also be speaking at the meeting next week, and I caught up with him yesterday. He thinks , as I do, that there may be a need to consider a fundamental change in the governance structure of the capitalist system.


Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>