from Russia Insider:
Climate change is a fanatical western dogma based on fabricated data. And Russia is a proud and unapologetic heretic
It’s becoming more and more difficult to hide the fact that anthropogenic climate change is a hoax based on sloppy science.
Earlier this month, a former top scientist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) blew the whistle on a key (and fraudulent) climate report issued just before the United Nations’ Climate Change Conference in 2015:
Dr. John Bates, led NOAA’s climate-data records program for ten years and reveals stunning allegations in a lengthy Daily Mail exposé posted February 4. His main charge is that the federal government’s top agency in charge of climate science published a flawed but widely accepted study that was meant to disprove the hiatus in global warming. Bates accuses the study’s lead author, NOAA official Tom Karl, of using unverified data sets, ignoring mandatory agency procedures, and failing to archive evidence — all in a “blatant attempt to intensify the impact” of the paper in advance of the conference.
Dr. Bates proved conclusively what many already assumed back in 2015: That NOAA was fiddling with data in order to make the science fit the agenda. As the Daily Caller reported back in 2015, “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration scientists have found a solution to the 15-year ‘pause’ in global warming: They ‘adjusted’ the hiatus.” Bates confirmed it was all bogus.
Dr. Bates’ decision to spill the beans about NOAA’s “scientific methods” was even noticed and applauded by Congress:
Here’s a statement from Committee Chairman Lamar Smith:
I thank Dr. John Bates for courageously stepping forward to tell the truth about NOAA’s senior officials playing fast and loose with the data in order to meet a politically predetermined conclusion. In the summer of 2015, whistleblowers alerted the Committee that the Karl study was rushed to publication before underlying data issues were resolved to help influence public debate about the so-called Clean Power Plan and upcoming Paris climate conference. Since then, the Committee has attempted to obtain information that would shed further light on these allegations, but was obstructed at every turn by the previous administration’s officials. I repeatedly asked, ‘What does NOAA have to hide?’
They’re hiding a lot. And there’s a clear agenda.
Russia already knows that man-made climate change is a hoax. But it looks like the west is finally starting to catch on.
It’s been widely reported that Putin personally believes that “there is no global warming, that this is a fraud to restrain the industrial development of several countries, including Russia.” (A Putin critic actually told this to the New York Times. It was meant to shock and horrify western news consumers. We think it’s a great quote.)
More recently, Putin stated that challenges “caused by global warming, hurricanes, droughts, floods and other anomalies are [a major] source of economic damage.”
And herein lies the big difference between Moscow and Washington when it comes to climate change: Russia doesn’t think California is going to sink into the ocean. And if it does, it won’t have anything to do with whether or not you drove a hybrid.
The big lie peddled by climate change fanatics is that you are an oil lobbyist if you don’t believe that we are all going to die unless the U.N. implements an eco dictatorship. Moscow isn’t begging to buy carbon credits — the modern eco equivalent of the corrupt Catholic Indulgence system — but it does want to work with the international community to help preserve and protect the environment.
Russia has expressed interest in renewable energies (it’s also just a good idea in a strategic sense) while also dismissing the idea that we’re all about to get washed away by a giant tsunami caused by too many cow farts.
Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.