The Phaserl


Gun Control Is Now A First Amendment Issue

by James Corbett, The International Forecaster:

…the good news is that the era of physible guns is already here, and it has made the Second Amendment debate effectively moot. The bad news is that the era of physible guns is here and it has made gun control into a First Amendment debate.

If you’re an American of the constitutionalist ilk, you may think that the ability to keep and bear arms is a sacred right enshrined in the Second Amendment. Those who fear human liberty, on the other hand, will argue that you’re trapped in an antiquated, 18th century mindset. And you know what? They’re right. In the 21st century, the real legal battlefield in the war over gun rights will not be the Second Amendment, but the First Amendment.

You see, in the coming years our very concept of what actually constitutes an object will change radically. What matters now is not physical objects, but physibles. Yes, you read that right: physibles.

A physible is the digital blueprint for creating a physical object through technology like a 3D printer. It’s not the finished product, but the recipe for that product. And just like a recipe for the perfect chocolate cake is more dangerous for your waistline than the cake itself (because it allows you to make thousands more of them), so to could the “recipe” for a physical object like a gun be more “dangerous” to would-be gun controllers than the gun itself, because with those instructions and the right piece of technology, anyone, anywhere can manufacture as many guns as they like.

Case in point: Defense Distributed, Inc. This is the corporation founded in 2012 by Ben Denio and Cody Wilson in order to “defend the human and civil right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the United States Constitution and affirmed by the United States Supreme Court; to collaboratively produce, publish, and distribute to the public information and knowledge related to the digital manufacture of arms.”

Talk about ‘collaboratively producing, publishing and distributing’ the knowledge of digital arms manufacture might sound like something out of some William Gibson-esque cyberpunk novel, but I have some news for you: The technology for doing just that is already here. Defense Distributed designed a physible, 3D-printed single shot handgun called “The Liberator” and released the plans for that gun on the internet in 2013.

The name “Liberator” is a nod to the FP-45 Liberator, a single-shot pistol manufactured by the US military during WWII for the Office of Strategic Services, the forerunner to the CIA. The OSS intended the pistols to be dropped into occupied areas for use by resistance forces. The idea was that the pistols, capable of only a single use, would be effective not as a weapon of combat so much as a psychological weapon. Just the knowledge that those pistols were out there in the hands of civilian resistance forces would make occupation more difficult and effect the morale of the Axis troops.

The FP-45 didn’t amount to much. Fewer than 25,000 of the half million manufactured were even distributed, and their use was never documented. And if Uncle Sam has his way, the Defense Distributed Liberator will go the way of the FP-45.

You see, within two days of Defense Distributed releasing the plans for the Liberator of the internet, the State Department’s Office of Defense Trade Controls sent a letter demanding that the plans be taken down. Their justification? The State Department’s interest in protecting national security–specifically, from preventing foreign nationals from learning how to produce weapons and weapons parts–actually outweighs American citizens’ right to free speech.

That’s right, the possibility that someone in a nation hostile to the US might learn how to 3D print a one-time use pistol is apparently why the State Department is allowed to revoke the First Amendment and stop people from publishing information on the internet.

So this is how gun control has officially become a First Amendment issue.

As a result, Defense Distributed were forced to take down the plans (but not before they were downloaded 100,000 times). But Cody Wilson and the company he helped create have not given up their fight against the injunction. They have filed a lawsuit against the State Department challenging the take-down and plan to fight it all the way up to the Supreme Court if need be.

It’s going to be an uphill battle. Just this past September the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals denied a request to stay the injunction against posting the plans while the case is being fought. Once again, the court ruled that the vaguely defined catch-all of “national security” trumps Americans’ right to free speech:

“The fact that national security might be permanently harmed while Plaintiffs-Appellants’ constitutional rights might be temporarily harmed strongly supports our conclusion that the district court did not abuse its discretion in weighing the balance in favor of national defense and national security.”

Read More @

Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.

2 comments to Gun Control Is Now A First Amendment Issue

  • f16hoser

    Gun Control is “NO ISSUE!” We have ’em, own ’em and will pass them down to our heirs with knowledge on how to use them. Also, most importantly, we teach our children that the real threat to freedom is out of control governments like the US Gov.

  • Craig Escaped Detroit

    If Pakistani, Afghani, Iraqi, and so many other backward, backwoods, deep in the desert, primitive machine shop operators can make select fire, pistols, rifles, and also make cannons, mortars, rockets, etc… the idea of going ape shit over 3D digital printing plans is ridiculous.

    Yes, the government argument against that type of “free speech” is just another back door approach to tyranny.
    The old “Grease Guns” of WW2 (45acp sub machine guns) that was mostly just a pipe, a barrel, and a bed spring that they cranked out in huge numbers for just $23 each, or the British “Sten Gun”, 9mm, that was similar but cost only $9-11 each. It’s not so hard. It’s a “slam fire” gun.

    Those Arab terror shops, make 50 caliber machine guns, 20mm cannons, 81mm mortars, rockets, etc. Now they’re even turning out remote controlled drone-bombs.
    Over in the middle east, there are empty shell casings laying all over the place, as well as tons of ammo & explosives available. Reloading the empty brass is big business over there.

    Now we’ve got hobbyists making home made “rail guns”, hand-held, high powered cutting lasers, plasma weapons, etc. Personally, I like the idea of the 45 caliber air rifles doing 1000 fps.
    If you charge the pressure with hydrogen gas, you can get up around 1400 fps or more?

    Then, of course, is the silent, CIA “heart attack pistol” that fires an ICICLE DRUG dose that enters the body, melts and causes a heart attack. It was shown at a Congressional hearing back in the 70’s or 80’s?
    I understand that now, they’ve got a radio frequency transmitter, that broadcasts the exact frequency needed to scramble your brain’s signals and make you drop dead.

    There are all kinds of dangerous things that cannot be traced or tracked. Scary stuff.

    And then we’ve got Monsanto’s RoundUp and other such “goodies” to be concerned about.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>