The Phaserl


Be Prepared for a Violent Fed Reversal

by Jim Rickards, DailyReckoning:

The outlook for rates has taken what I call a U-turn. There’s very little doubt that the Fed is on track to raise rates. This outlook is not in response to any particular piece of economic data or the overall economic picture. In fact there are plenty of arguments why the Fed should not raise rates based on economic fundamentals.

However, they have a separate agenda which is that the Fed has committed, what I think will be viewed in hindsight, as a historical blunder by missing the opportunity to raise rates in 2010, 2011, 2012. That was when the economy was growing, not strongly but those were the early stages of the expansion.

The economy was growing well enough then to justify rate increases. If the Fed had normalized rates in 2011-2012, between 2 – 2.5%, they would be in a good position today to cut rates if necessary to fight a recession. Unfortunately they did not do that. They missed an entire cycle while experimenting with Ben Bernanke’s quantitative easing, which in hindsight will turn out to be a real mistake by the Fed.

Now they’re in the position to move rates after the eighth year into the recovery. While this has been a weak recovery, and people are still struggling with part-time employment, or can’t launch careers on top of other difficulties, this recovery technically started in June of 2009. This makes for a very long recession by historic standards. More than twice as long as the average expansion since World War II, and comparable to the very long expansions we’ve had since 1980.

We’re closer to the end of this cycle than the beginning. The Fed is concerned that if another recession started tomorrow (and I’m not saying it will, but it could) it would have no ability to cut rates.

While they currently have rates at 50 basis points, the Fed could only do two cuts until it was back to zero. This would force the decision to begin talking about negative interest rates. The Fed leadership wants to get rates up to 2 or 3% before any potential recession starts, just so they can cut them.

The problem is, how do you raise rates to that level? How do you raise rates to 2 or 3% without causing a recession that you’re trying to prevent? That’s what I call the Fed’s conundrum, and that’s exactly where the Fed is now. Is this a good time to raise rates? Probably not, but they are going to try to do it anyway.

The Fed has said they’re on track to raise three times this year. The market doesn’t believe it. The market is counting on maybe two rate hikes at most, but not three. My expectation right now is that the Fed will raise rates in March.

First, they have a bias towards raising rates. The Fed is not neutral. The threshold is fairly low. They feel that it’s “mission accomplished” on the job front; unemployment is 4.7%, we’re continuing to create over 100,000 jobs a month. That’s not the 2 or 300,000 jobs that we were creating a year to year and a half ago. It is still positive job growth, and with unemployment low and this rate in expansion, that’s “good enough.”

Second, the Fed is concerned about inflation. The Fed believes that monetary policy acts with a lag. This means if you think inflation is coming, and expectations are going up, you need to raise rates now because it takes about a year for increases to have impact. They don’t want to get behind the curve.

While unemployment is low, together with other factors, the Fed applies what’s called a Phillips curve for analysis. While I personally don’t put much stock in the Phillips curve, it is worth analyzing to understand what the Fed does in order to forecast policy. If the Fed believes Donald Trump’s policies will be stimulative, while unemployment’s 4.7%, a standard Phillips curve for analysis would tell them that inflation is going to pick up late this year. This indicates that they should raise rates now to stay ahead.

The Fed’s got a conventional macroeconomic reason to raise rates, which is based on a Trump stimulus. They also have a bias towards raising rates because they should’ve raised them five years ago and didn’t. For those reasons, I put them on track to raise rates now in March.

Now the market doesn’t expect this, or at least it is not giving that a lot of weight. The probability based on Fed funds futures is below 50%, so what the Fed will try to do over the next month or so is to steer expectations. The way they do this is leaks to the press, speeches and commentaries. Expect that to play out over the next month or so to try to get expectations up where the rate hike’s not a shock.

Here’s where the U-turn comes in. If the Fed raises rates in March, which I expect right now, the economy is fundamentally weak.

Here you’ve got the Fed trying to lean into stimulus, biased in favor of rate hikes at late stages for the economy. The stimulus might not be that stimulating. You could have a combination of the Fed raising rates, the Trump plan not producing that much stimulus, and the Fed raising into weakness and throwing the economy into recession.

If that happens, the stock market will “fall out of bed.” This won’t tomorrow, by the way; this is something I expected to play out over the course of time.

Read More @

Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.

2 comments to Be Prepared for a Violent Fed Reversal

  • Ed_B

    “If the Fed had normalized rates in 2011-2012, between 2 – 2.5%, they would be in a good position today to cut rates if necessary to fight a recession. Unfortunately they did not do that.”

    No, they did not… and I agree that they should have. In fact, this has been my financial thesis as well in several posts on this subject both here and at Silver Doctors.

    “They missed an entire cycle while experimenting with Ben Bernanke’s quantitative easing, which in hindsight will turn out to be a real mistake by the Fed.”

    Agreed. The Fed makes quite a few mistakes and this is but another. IMO, the Fed’s problem is that they are heavily staffed with academics who want to study everything to death before actually doing anything about them. Unfortunately, the real world doesn’t work that slowly. Prior to all the manipulation of the various markets by the US Gov and the Fed over the past several years, the market was more than smart enough to set the share prices of stocks. It should come as no surprise that the market is also smart enough to set the price of borrowing money, aka interest rates. This should be a free market function that is determined strictly by borrowers and lenders via competitive bidding… and no one else… and most definitely no futures or options are needed.

    The beauty of having the free market set the rates is that we would have many very small adjustments in rates over time instead of a very few but much larger in size rate changes. This would result in a much smoother and steadier rate over time because the rates would always be where justified by market actions… and not the actions / in-actions of a pack of unelected bureaucratic academics.

  • jack

    ..i.e. there is no “fee market pricing…the Fed buys stocks and most gov’t bonds…they, like children, just print “money” and throw it at paper stock prices and bonds (until they are caught out again).

    PE ratios are insane. Period.
    Which currency would come (with crashed currencies) to the usa stock and bond market – and buy anything? Right.

    Total fake market.
    USA!USA USA…go…go…go.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>