Categories





The Phaserl








TheLibertyMill


Why Liberals Can’t Handle the Truth About Russia Hacking the Election

by Caleb Stephen, Intellihub:

Liberals can’t handle the truth because they are butthurt

Donald J. Trump won the U.S. election by a landslide but butthurt, sore liberal losers are not having any of it.

Instead, as we’ve seen, they’ve turned to malevolent tactics in an effort to express their disapproval of the democratically elected billionaire real estate tycoon.

First they tried rioting and that didn’t work. Then they tried sending death threats to electoral college members and that failed. The ‘fake news’ narrative also failed. Jill Stein’s recount was an epic fail, but not after she had carted away $6.3 million dollars from the gullible voters she scammed as part of her election recount campaign

Now since all of the above failed, they’ve turned to another tactic – which, I might add, is probably not the last one in their arsenal.

Spoiler alert: It failed overnight.

This time it’s The Washington Post attempting to insult our intelligence by pushing the notion that Russia helped Trump win the White House by leaking hacked information to Wikileaks.

Here’s an excerpt from the Post’s ridiculous fake news story:

“Intelligence agencies have identified individuals with connections to the Russian government who provided WikiLeaks with thousands of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and others, including Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, according to U.S. officials. Those officials described the individuals as actors known to the intelligence community and part of a wider Russian operation to boost Trump and hurt Clinton’s chances.“

This information came from a factually incomplete and shonky CIA report that cannot be trusted. This is evidenced by the fact that later on in the article, they essentially debunked themselves:

The CIA presentation to senators about Russia’s intentions fell short of a formal U.S. assessment produced by all 17 intelligence agencies. A senior U.S. official said there were minor disagreements among intelligence officials about the agency’s assessment, in part because some questions remain unanswered.

For example, intelligence agencies do not have specific intelligence showing officials in the Kremlin “directing” the identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks, a second senior U.S. official said. Those actors, according to the official, were “one step” removed from the Russian government, rather than government employees. Moscow has in the past used middlemen to participate in sensitive intelligence operations so it has plausible deniability.

The lead agency of the intelligence community – the Office of the Director of National Intelligence has not embraced the CIA’s assessment for the same reason according to Reuters.

This is not the first time a mainstream media outlet such as the Washington Post has run a fake news story based upon a factually incomplete investigation and it certainly won’t be the last.

But, what is more concerning is that the left is willing to divide the nation, risk civil war in America and risk nuclear war with Russia simply because they couldn’t get over the reality that they lost! I hope that sinks in.

The laughable thing is that not a single shred of evidence has been presented that actually proves Russia interfered with the U.S. election.

The former UK ambassador Craig Murray said he met the DNC leaker in person and he wasn’t even Russian nor did he have connections with Moscow – he was simply a disgruntled insider.

Julian Assange has maintained all along that the source was not Russian. Trump himself has dismissed the CIA’s findings about Russian hacking.

But when it comes to the crunch, who do we trust? On the one hand we have Wikileaks whose credibility and track record is essentially impeccable and then on the other hand we’ve got obscure and CIA sources whose entire job description is based on deception through disinformation (Google ‘Operation Mockingbird’ for more information).

And who actually are these ‘anonymous CIA sources’? Of course, they can’t tell us because they have a lot to hide but we know for a fact that they’re undoubtedly the very same agenda-driven, prostrating Democratic sympathizers who are already under inspector-General investigation.

I think I know whom I’d trust. Wikileaks, hands down.

Let’s not forget that these same anonymous CIA sources were the same ones who claimed Russia hacked the RNC as well but only released negative findings about the DNC.

The FBI investigated and found the RNC was not actually hacked despite CIA claims to the contrary. The FBI even offered ‘conclusive proof’ to the NY Times that the hacking did not happen but these mentally enslaved media shills weren’t interested because it did not fit their fabricated narrative.

The FBI also investigated any Russian links to Donald Trump and found zero evidence. This has also been admitted by the Washington Post as being inconclusive. There’s also zero evidence the Russians hacked Hillary campaign chair John Podesta’s emails.

It seems to me that when all else fails, blame it on the Russians.

Read More @ Intellihub.com

Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>