The Phaserl


NIST’s Role in 9/11 Cover-up

Established to be a pillar of scientific accuracy, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has prostituted itself in the case of its role in helping the dark elements of the U.S. Government to cover their tracks of culpability in the 9/11 tragedy.

by Sterling D. Allan, Son of NIST atomic clock physicist, Patriot Saints:

“In the case of WTC 7 […], for 100 feet of free fall to take place, they had to completely remove 8 floors of structural support, uniformly across the entire width of the building, simultaneously, to within a fraction of a second. This cannot happen naturally. It is a clear smoking gun for controlled demolition.  …Conclusion: On the first round, NIST falsified measurements in order to deny free-fall.  It then turned around and admitted free-fall but denied its significance.   …Free-fall requires that explosives had to be used.  Planting explosives in WTC7 would require time and high-level access to this very secure building well before 9/11.  Whoever rigged WTC7 was clearly complicit in the entire 9/11 operation.  Given that NIST knows what they are doing, we can be justified in calling their methodology ‘fraudulent’.  Fraudulent behavior in this context constitutes participation in a criminal cover-up.” — David Chandler, high school Physics teacher, at the 2009 annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology.


NIST has become party to the 9/11 cover-up, falsifying information, cooking the data, and otherwise acting in disregard to the ethics of science it is supposed to not only uphold but epitomize as the official body for the United States establishing standards of measurement.  NIST is supposed to be the final word on measurement accuracy, but in the case of 9/11, they have prostituted themselves at the hands of their Federal masters who are likewise involved in the cover-up.  They have thus become another tool in helping to establish a world socialist dictatorship under the control of a sinister, insider elite.

On Aug. 2008, NIST published their findings that the World Trade Center buildings came down “due to fire alone.”

Contrary to the Federal Government official story supported by the NIST report, many facts point to controlled demolition being the cause of the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings 1, 2 and 7:

  • Falling at near free-fall speed
  • Falling into their footprint
  • Symmetrical “collapse” through path of greatest resistance
  • Pulverization of the building into powder
  • Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
  • Squibs (horizontal, outward explosions) seen in advance of the collapsing portion
  • Many explosions heard by emergency personnel on the scene
  • Thermite and nanothermite found in the dust
  • The occurrence of micro-spheres in the dust, which could only happen under super high temperatures (from thermitic reactions), not consistent with a building fire fire
  • Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses
  • Liquid iron in the wreckage a month after the collapse (from continued thermite reaction)
  • The fact that never before had a fire caused a steel structure building to fail
  • The fact that the buildings had recently undergone elevator upgrades, giving access to the support structure
  • The fact that the building had an emergency evacuation just a few days prior to 9/11 in which security cameras were disabled (providing access)
  • The owner of WTC building 7 (Larry Silverstein) videotaped saying that they “pulled” (demolished) the building
  • Cover-up galore by those who were capable of pulling this off

None of the characteristics of destruction by fire were present:

  • Slow onset with large visible deformations
  • Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
  • Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel

Volumes of evidence and commentary on each of the above points are found throughout the web, but are presented concisely on the home page of in the right hand column with links to supporting evidence.

Here’s a brief TV snippet interview with a key spokesman of the 9/11 Truth Movement.

  • 700 architects and engineers calling for new 911 building collapse investigation (video) – Richard Gage, who specializes in steel-frame, fireproof buildings, acts as spokesman for a body of Engineers who are questioning the official explanation for the collapse of the three towers in New York on 911, citing the controlled demolition behavior of the collapse as well as discovery of demolition-consistent materials in the dust. Dark insider ramifications. (KMPH, Fox 26; Fresno; posted on YouTube; May 28, 2009) (Want to Know)

Relevant Links

  • – (articles are peer reviewed)
    • Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction – Steven E. Jones, et al.
      Abstract: In an effort to better understand the conditions that led to complete collapses of the World Trade Center Towers and WTC 7, we apply scanning-electron-microscope (SEM) and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (XEDS) methods to analyze the dust generated, with an emphasis on observed micro-spheres in the WTC dust. The formation of molten spheres with high iron contents along with other species in the WTC dust required extremely high temperatures. Our results are compared with those of other laboratories. The temperatures required for the molten sphere-formation and evaporation of materials as observed in the WTC dust are significantly higher than temperatures associated with the burning of jet fuel and office materials in the WTC buildings. (Jan. 2008)
    • Controlled Demolition at the WTC: a Historical Examination of the Case – Frank Legge (PhD Chem) – “I got hold of some software, FrameShots, free on the internet, and examined the videos, frame by frame. ( There is better software available now.) I was able to confirm that the initial movement of all three buildings was suspiciously fast. In the case of WTC 7 the initial acceleration was so close to free fall that there could be no doubt that all the columns, or most of the columns, must have been severed simultaneously.”  Discredits the 2008 NIST report. (May, 2009)
    • 9/11 and Probability Theory – Frank M Legge (BSc, PhD) gives a summary which compares the official theory with the alternative explosive demolition theory in terms of their relative probability. (10 June 2008)
    • The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites (7-02-08) – Some argue that NIST failed to look for evidence of explosives simply because they were ignorant of such matters. This is clearly not the case as Kevin Ryan shows. “Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues? … NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.” — NIST Responses to FAQs, August 2006
  • Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction – Paper by Dr. Steven E. Jones, et al., diplomatically questioning and rebutting the conclusions of the NIST report. (Reprinted with permission of Dr. Jones) (The Open Civil Engineering Journal; 2008, 2, 35-40)
  • Building a Better Mirage: NIST’s 3-Year $20,000,000 Cover-up of the Crime of the Century – Jim Huffman points out that the 10,000-page report by NIST is a “distraction,” such as 1000 pages modeling the airplane, while only 1/2 page is spent on the core assumption of the “collapse initiation” and the following “global collapse.”
  • – Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth.  Sign the petition for a REAL investigation.
  • http://www.stj911.orgScholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice
  • http://firefightersfor911truth.orgFirefighters for 9/11 Truth
  • http://lawyersfor911truth.blogspot.comLawyers for 9/11 Truth
  • Leaders for 9/11 Truth
  • http://mp911truth.orgMedical Professionals for 9/11 Truth


9/11 Videos Regarding NIST Cover-up

Why the NIST report on WTC7 is unscientific and false

Here’s an excellent compilation of facts versus NIST blatant lies.


– – – –

Lead Engineer for NIST Report Caught in Bold-Faced Lie about Molten Metal

Here’s a video of John Gross, lead engineer of the NIST report, saying that there were no witnesses whatsoever of molten metal, compared to the evidence of a plethora of eyewitnesses, photos, and video of molten metal provided by Richard Gage to the contrary:

John Gross says: “First of all, let’s go back to your basic premise that there was a pool of molten steel.  I know of absolutely nobody, no eyewitnesses who said so, nobody who’s produced it.”

Molten metal, more than a month after the attack, is probably the most obvious smoking gun of pre-planted explosives of demolition charges.  Thermite or thermate continue to react with metal, and that is why there was molten metal so long afterward.

That John Gross would make such a blatant lie about something so well-proven, shows the degree to which NIST is going in covering up this crime.

NIST’s lead investigator into the WTC attacks, John Gross, is caught lying, saying that he has not seen nor knows of anyone who has seen liquefied metal in the WTC rubble.  This video shows the many contradictions to his assertion. (”YouTube”; )

* * * *

WTC7: NIST Admits Freefall, But . . .

In this three-part series, physicist David Chandler, on behalf of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, documents the “dry labbing” done by NIST regarding World Trade Center building 7, in which measurements are falsified to support a pre-determined outcome.

Here’s a synopsis of the data, followed by the video presentation by David Chandler.

David Chandler’s data from video analysis

NIST’s data from video analysis

The above graph by NIST shows rounded beginnings and ends, before and after the free-fall Phase II, to save face from earlier pronouncements of a total fall time in excess of 5.6 seconds, in support of their theory of downward resistance by an in-tact building, as opposed to free-fall dropping which would imply pre-placement of demolition charges, and conspiracy, and cover-up.  The analysis shown at the left, in contrast to the curves shown by NASA above, shows a sudden change from stationary to free-fall.  As you visually inspect building 7 falling, does it not look like a classic case of planned demolition?

“I think the 2.25-second period of actual free-fall acceleration (over 100 feet) admitted to by NIST is indeed compelling evidence for explosives use: what else could have moved hundred of thousands of tons of steel support columns and concrete out of the way to permit fall with no resistance?” — Dr. Steven E. Jones, Sept. 11, 2009, close friend of David W. Allan

Read More @

Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.

1 comment to NIST’s Role in 9/11 Cover-up

  • Thomas Potter

    The 9/11 official story is:

    Nineteen fanatical Arab hijackers, masterminded by an evil genius named Osama bin Laden, crash airplanes into steel skyscrapers because they “hate our freedom to consume”. (And what did Bush tell us to do right after the event? Go shopping!”) Inexplicably the jet fuel, which is basically kerosene that burns at about 400c, took on the qualities of an explosive demolition agent, vaporizing 70 tons of aircraft into a puff of smoke and causing 110-story buildings to collapse into a pile of rubble.

    The 9/11 Truth Movement has the dual purpose of vectoring genuine truth seekers to dead ends, where anger, hype, and paranoia endlessly stress the seeker and those around him or her, and to facilitate the mainstream media’s task of branding those who ask questions of authority and the true nature of reality as insane. What if the 9/11 Truth Movement is nothing more than a pseudo-movement promoting a government “alternative official” story?

    When the truth about 9/11 is finally exposed, not only will the wars be ended, but the world will finally be liberated from the grip of the oil companies. If you are interested in evidence and not opinion, read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? as I did over 5½ years ago.

    Popular theories about what destroyed the World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001 are:

    1 Fires from jet fuel and office materials weakened steel in the upper floors and the buildings collapsed

    2 Conventional controlled demolition blew out supports at the base and the buildings collapsed

    3 Thermite cut steel columns on virtually every floor and the buildings collapsed

    4 Conventional explosives blew the buildings up

    5 Mini-nukes blew the buildings up

    Theories 1, 2 and 3 rely on gravity to bring the buildings down while the last two blow them up. Popular theories, yes, and dead wrong.

    Five facts scientifically documented in Ph.D. engineer Judy Wood’s comprehensive textbook (Where Did The Towers Go?) prove the popular theories false beyond any doubt whatsoever. Yes, I know it’s amazing. Who’d a thunk it’d be this easy? I’m a thinker and not a believer. It is in the interest of the government to have a population of believers and not thinkers. The media assists this goal explicitly and in concert as agents-of-influence.


    1. DEBRIS: What debris? There was so little debris from each 110-story building that there was no “pile” or “stack.” Rubble totaled less than a story. It was a football field as a survivor who emerged from Stairwell B, North Tower, exclaimed. No computers, toilets, and only one small piece from one Steel-case file cabinet were found. Some steel and mostly dust remained. Lack of debris on the ground from quarter-mile-high twin towers whispers “no collapse.” See Chapter 9.

    2. BATHTUB: A bathtub or slurry wall surrounded 70 feet of WTC subbasements to prevent the Hudson River from flooding the WTC and downtown. If each 500,000-ton tower had slammed into the bathtub in 10 seconds or less, the protective wall would collapse. Did not happen. Upshot? Collapses did not happen. See Chapter 5.

    3. SEISMIC IMPACT: “Had the towers collapsed, foundation bedrock would have experienced tremendous force hammering on it throughout the ‘collapse,’” writes Dr. Wood. Seismic instruments registered disturbances far too short in duration and far too small to record tower collapses. This was true of both the twin towers and 47-story WTC7. Again, no evidence of collapses. See Chapter 6.

    4. SOUND: There were no loud explosions, as established by videos, witnesses, and the official report of NIST. Nor were there loud screeches and screams from massive metal falling, colliding, scraping and collapsing on metal. See Chapter 6.

    5. DUST: Photos, videos and witness testimony show the towers turned to powder in mid-air. Tim McGinn, NYPD, said, “I was standing there for a couple of seconds thinking where the f**k is the tower? I simply couldn’t comprehend it.” The dust roll-out was so enormous and thick it blocked out sunlight and left an inch or more of dust covering downtown. Much of it wafted into the upper atmosphere. The volume was incredible. Particles from dust samples were smaller than red blood cells and about the size of DNA. As for toxicity, researchers said the dust “recorded the highest levels we have ever seen in over 7,000 measurements we have made of very fine air pollution throughout the world, including Kuwait and China.” See Chapters 8, 9, 14-16.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>