The Phaserl


New Era: Hillary Loses Control of ‘Net Narrative

from The Daily Bell:

Billionaire businessman Mark Cuban, a fierce supporter of Hillary Clinton, said the Democratic nominee’s recent health episode is being overblown. “It’s not crazy, it’s lazy,” he told Business Insider in a Monday interview regarding coverage of Clinton’s pneumonia. -Business Insider

It’s a battle of memes and elite dispensers are growing irritated and increasingly worried about losing control (see excerpt, above).

This didn’t happen in the 20th century or even at the beginning of the 21st. It’s something new, spawned directly by the Internet.

And right now Hillary is the main target and victim. At least the most high profile.

Hillary herself saw it coming. During remarks to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee back in early 2011, she stated (here) that the US was engaged in an information “war” and was losing.

At the time she pointed toward the Chinese and the Russians as “winning” the information war and indicated watching their English-language channels was “instructive.”

But if one judges from recent statements by Hillary and her campaign, the real concern is domestic reporting.

Her campaign recently bashed conservative/libertarian publishing group Breitbart and in a speech she directly attacked one of the most prominent alternative media groups, Alex Jones and his Infowars.

Cuban is expressing irritation at a single topic, Hillary’s health, but the larger issue is even more important:

Gradually elite propaganda is being undermined by ‘Net information watched by more and more people. Additionally, this information is obviously seen as credible or the audience would be shrinking not growing.

The influence of alternative ‘Net media is becoming overwhelming. Even a few years ago ‘Net information might debunk a given elite meme. But debunkery focused on specific issues, ones such as vaccines, central banking and US serial warfare.

But now Internet information is superseding elite propaganda and is choosing its own targets.

It is become proactive rather than reactive.

Hillary never issued much information on her health but it became an issue nonetheless. The Internet forced the issue. And then as events occurred, the ‘Net meme spread considerably.


“You know, it’s one thing to speculate on Hillary’s health and that’s fair game for obvious reasons, but the reality is in one week, we’ll know,” Cuban said …

He added that he’s frustrated with the media’s focus on such issues, pointing the finger at both online and more traditional outlets.

Cuban can continue to be frustrated and that’s probably because he is missing the point. He is reacting to a specific story but he is not addressing the larger issue.

The “mass media” in an unprecedented fashion is losing control.

This is not merely opinion. Statistics regularly indicate this is occurring. Just the other day, Gallup updated a poll on “confidence in media.”

32% say they have “a great deal” or “a fair amount” of trust
14% of Republicans express trust, down from 32% last year
Confidence drops among younger and older Americans

Now it is true that the article did not exactly differentiate between mainstream and alternative media. In fact, in using the term “mass media,” the survey purposefully blurred the responses. Here:

With the explosion of the mass media in recent years, especially the prevalence of blogs, vlogs and social media, perhaps Americans decry lower standards for journalism.

When opinion-driven writing becomes something like the norm, Americans may be wary of placing trust on the work of media institutions that have less rigorous reporting criteria than in the past. On the other hand, as blogs and social media “mature,” they may improve in the American public’s eyes. This could, in turn, elevate Americans’ trust and confidence in the mass media as a whole.

This is nonsense, of course. We can see clearly that as the mainstream media shrinks, alternative media proliferates. The most influential news service in the US if not the world is

Read More @

Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.

4 comments to New Era: Hillary Loses Control of ‘Net Narrative

  • Ed_B

    “It’s a battle of memes and elite dispensers are growing irritated and increasingly worried about losing control…”

    Too bad that these people do not understand that “control” is an illusion… and a temporary one at that. :-/

  • anon

    “Gradually elite propaganda is being undermined by ‘Net information watched by more and more people.”

    Truth doesn’t need endless lies (i.e., end-less propaganda) to support it. It just is. And, when an individual encounters a grand/big truth, it is breath-taking, the sheer number of those endless lies which are then cast aside, that one formerly believed, as a result of having been raised & conditioned to believe them, & bombarded by them, one’s entire life, by one’s entire culture, and its mainstream media, owned-and-operated by the “controllers” working 24/7, through their legions of minions, to shape the public mind. Where everyone thinks alike, no one thinks very much.

  • Randy

    Right effin’ on, Anon!! And when no one thinks very much, the whole civilization collapses right down to rock bottom again. Gone then are the dream makers, the artists and technicians who make life easier. When all of the men and women who not only create the society in which we live, but repair it too when it is broken are gone, the elites will not have their creature comforts any longer. They too will be reduced to wearing animal hides once again instead of fine silks and linens. They will have to live a hand to mouth existence and be glad for every scrap of food and drop of clean water that they can find.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>