The Phaserl


JUSTICE? …NEVER!! In DNC Fraud Case, Focus Shifts to Video Featuring Process Server Who Mysteriously Died

[Ed. Note: OUTRAGE: Shawn Lucas may have been murdered for serving the DNC with a lawsuit, now a judge is backing DNC lawyers who claim the suit was not properly served.]

by Rachel Stockman, Law Newz:

There is a very strange twist in the class action fraud lawsuit filed against the Democratic National Committee and former Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz. The recent developments haven’t gotten much mainstream media attention, but they are all documented in federal court. So, we decided to dig into them. And yes, they involve a lawsuit process server — who “served” the DNC with the class action paperwork—and then suddenly died.

The lawsuit, which was actually filed before the Wikileaks document dump, claims that the DNC “actively concealed its bias” from its donors and supporters backing Bernie Sanders. Hundreds of Sanders supporters have reportedly signed up to be part of the class. They have even started a very active Facebook page.

The plaintiffs say the recent Wikileaks emails only give them more evidence that the Democratic National Committee was on board with Hillary Clinton from the very start.

A guy named Shawn Lucas “served” the DNC and Debbie Wassermann Schultz with a lawsuit back in July. He was a lawsuit process server. He even posted a YouTube video of him serving the lawsuit which can been seen below. The video has garnered nearly a half a million views. That’s partly because about a month after he served the lawsuit and amidst the Wikileaks scandal, Lucas suddenly died. Online conspiracy theorists have said the two must be related. There is absolutely no evidence of that so far. The police report says he was found unconscious laying on the bathroom floor of his Washington D.C. home.  The D.C. Metropolitan Police tell that the investigation is still ongoing.

But the video has become the subject of a court fight. The question is whether the plaintiffs (the Bernie Sanders supporters) properly served the the defendants (Wasserman and the DNC). That actually matters because, according to the federal rules, if you don’t serve the lawsuit properly to the opposing side, you can’t move forward with the case. Lawyers for the DNC contend they weren’t properly served.  If you watch to the video, you will see Lucas served the lawsuit to a woman named Rebecca Herries. She was apparently an assistant to one of the DNC executives.  DNC lawyers are trying to derail the case by saying that that even though she works for the DNC,  “she doesn’t have authority” to accept the lawsuit. If you read the transcript, you will see that she certainly made it seem like she had authority to deal with the legal matter. Here’s how the conversation went down, according to the video:

Read More @

Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>