Categories



TheLibertyMill




The Phaserl








AvatarProducts

Why Isn’t the Media Covering Hillary Clinton’s Extremely Bizarre Behavior?

by Michael Krieger, Liberty Blitzkrieg:

On December 27, 2015 Dilbert creator Scott Adams wrote the following on his blog.

One of the skills a hypnotist has to master is reading people’s inner thoughts based on their body language. That’s a common skill for people in the business world too, but hypnotists go deeper than looking at crossed arms and furrowed brows. We learn to look for subtle changes in breathing patterns, tiny changes in muscle tone, variations in skin color (blushing or not), word choice, pupil dilation, and more. I assume law enforcement people look for similar tells when doing interrogations.

As regular readers know, I’m a trained hypnotist. And to me, Hillary Clinton looks as if she is hiding a major health issue. If you read Malcolm Gladwell’s book, Blink, you know that so-called “experts” can sometimes instantly make decisions before they know why. In my case, I am going to make an “expert” hypnotist prediction about Hillary Clinton without knowing exactly which clues I am picking up, or whether I am hallucinating them.

Prediction: I’ll put the odds at 75% that we learn of an important Clinton health issue before the general election. That estimate is based on my own track record of guessing things about people without the benefit of knowing why. I think Trump is picking up the same vibe. He has already questioned Clinton’s “stamina.”

That was a pretty bold prediction at the time, and it looks like it might be coming true.

When I first saw the video below, of Hillary Clinton deflecting a question about Elizabeth Warren by wildly bobbing her head in two distinct spasms, I merely dismissed it as a faked video edited to make her look crazy. This is why I never shared or commented on it. I assumed there was no way Hillary Clinton actually acted like that in public, especially in front of reporters.

Ask yourself, have you ever interacted with someone in real life who responded in that fashion to a question, or to anything for that matter? Moreover, does that seem like the kind of behavior you’d expect or want out of a President?

The above interaction occurred on June 10th (click here for the original tweet), but it’s generated increased attention as of late as further videos of Clinton exhibiting bizarre, erratic behavior have emerged. Here’s another captured during the Democratic National Convention.

Now here’s the latest, and possibly most disturbing video of the series. This is the clip that has finally put many of us over the edge, wondering the heck is going on with this woman.

As you can see, when protesters appear at around the 8 second mark, Hillary Clinton completely freezes up. It’s pretty subtle, but yet extremely obvious to the man who is being referred to by some as her “handler;” a man who immediately jumps on stage to comfort her, scramble secret service members away and walk her through the episode by repeatedly saying “keep talking,” which she eventually does (for more on this angle, read: Who is Hillary’s Handler).

This episode warrants a detailed explanation by the Hillary campaign to the American public. How can someone incapable of finishing a campaign stump speech without personal coaching be elected President? Moreover, why isn’t the mainstream media asking the simple questions that I, and countless others are asking?

Read More @ LibertyBlitzkrieg.com

Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.

9 comments to Why Isn’t the Media Covering Hillary Clinton’s Extremely Bizarre Behavior?

  • Willis9

    Rorey (or sean)

    Thank you for publiching this article!!!!!!!

  • dcm

    —- – SGT needs to interview Miss Barnhardt ————–
    CMR Barnhardt Interview Part 2: Answering the Age-old Question, Firing Squad or Hanging?

    This is Part 2 of my interview series from last summer with Pat Archbold of Creative Minority Report published on July 3, ARSH 2015. Obviously, Justice Scalia was still alive, but I stand foursquare behind every word herein. Just because a person dies does not alter reality one iota. What’s true is true.

    The Scalia post of mine that Pat references is HERE. ( http://www.barnhardt.biz/2015/06/26/on-scalias-dissent/ )

    ———————

    Pat Archbold: The fact that you call on Justice Scalia to resign seems to mean that you think the time reforming the federal government from the inside has passed and that good Catholic people can no longer in good conscience support this unconstitutional tyranny. Is this correct?

    Ann Barnhardt: Absolutely. Justice Scalia painted himself into a corner with his dissent in which he made clear that he fully appreciates the gravity and enormity of the situation vis-a-vis the Washington DC regime. I have an axiom, which I refer to as The Barnhardt Axiom. The Barnhardt Axiom states that seeking and/or holding public office, especially national-level public office, is today, in and of itself, proof that a given person is psychologically and morally unfit to hold public office. Sitting on the Supreme Court is a public office. The Barnhardt Axiom applies to both elected and unelected office, and can even be mapped at this late hour onto both the United States Military and the entirety of the Federal Bureaucracy.

    It all comes down to my insistence upon logical consistency and operating from the starting point of a true base premise. Namely, if one sees and understands that the Constitution is no longer in force and has no meaning, in fact that no law as written has any meaning in and of itself, how can one possibly continue engage and ratify by participation that which claims to yet be the very thing that it overthrew and destroyed? If John Smith rapes, beheads and eats Thomas Jones, can John Smith simply declare himself to BE Thomas Jones, and thus no crime has occurred? Each day that Justice Scalia continues to participate in the farce, he is calling John Smith “Thomas Jones”, while happily taking his $20k monthly salary from his new master, John Smith.

    But Scalia is by no means alone. I continue to watch aghast as the pundit class, even on the so-called “far right” persists in treating the Washington DC paradigm as a legitimate matrix worthy of discussion and engagement, even after reporting day in and day out one new proof set after another that the putsch regime has raped, beheaded and eaten the Constitutional Republic of the United States. For example, Hillary Clinton’s ever-growing list of high crimes are reported every single day. Hillary Clinton is a murderous, lying, cheating, larcenous, traitorous psychopath. Therefore, how can the question possibly be whether or not Hillary Clinton should be President of the (former) United States? What in the hell is the matter with you people, at long last? Can you not see the glaring insanity of the very premise?

    I’ll tell you right now what the real question is, and when this question starts being asked publicly, then I will sit up and pay attention, and dare to hope again: The question is whether or not, after arrest, a speedy trial and conviction of crimes against humanity, Hillary Clinton should be offered the sacraments and then be hanged, or put against a wall and shot. The answer, of course, is that she should be put against a wall and shot, and then her body should be hanged on public display so that any other aspiring psychopath oligarchs can see how a just, Christian society deals with their ilk. Sadly, this would first require the organization and declaration of of a replacement government, which simply is not going to happen due to the aforementioned effeminacy and pathological indifference of the populace. Removal – and by removal I mean execution – of the existing psychopathic political class outside of an organized, legitimate replacement government would be anarchy and would result in the advent of an even worse tyranny than what we have now. And since justice demands these people be executed, and their unquenchable malignancy can only be stopped by execution, post-modern, post-Christian culture finds itself utterly incapable of even the slightest self-correction.
    https://youtu.be/0OGudZ-K5Xs

  • Craig Escaped Detroit

    Too many fumes from the nail guns exhaust? Call it ‘recoil’ blowback disease.

    Mad Cow-Cankle Disease.

    I think you guys are right.

    Put a spork in it, she done like a pop-tart.

    • KRELL427

      Always get a chuckle from the Craig low down. Personally I think it would be fitting to watch her drop dead live on CNN while spewing out her BS.

  • AgShaman

    She reminds me of Arnold’s ‘cover’ in “Total Recall”…..maybe the ‘clone’ is on the fritz?

  • malcolm

    https://www.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Untitled-3-4.jpg

    Probably all part of the plan, maybe they are all going to do a David Bowie and Alan Rickman
    😉 wink wink

  • malcolm

    The Hilary video above with the blue collar, better explained here.

  • malcolm

    Alan Rickman and David Bowie both died from Cancer
    Both died at the age of 69
    69 is the astrological glyph of the star sign Cancer
    David Bowies last album was BLACK star that is the Sirius Star
    Alan Rickman Starred in Harry Potter and ORDER OF THE PHOENIX along with Gary Oldman whom played
    Sirius Black whom changed into a Black Dog Ie DOG STAR Sirius
    David Bowies last song released from his album Black star was Lazurus, Lazurus rose from the dead.
    A Phoenix rises from it’s ashes.
    Alan rickman starred in a film 30 years previous to David Bowies song Lazurus being released in a film called Galaxy Quest. His character in that film was Dr Lazurus.
    And on and on and on and on the links just keep going.
    The chances of coincidence NO WAY.
    If you watch that video above and what has been put here then the conclusion you should come to is that they are either very much alive, or something is not quite right.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>