The Phaserl


Beijing Crosses Washington’s ‘Red Line’ in South China Sea

from Sputnik News:

The Chinese military appears to be dramatically increasing its presence around a key island in the South China Sea, sending a strong message to Washington.

As Beijing continues its land reclamation projects in the South China Sea, Washington has remained adamant about one island in particular: Scarborough Shoal. Located northeast of the Spratly archipelago, it is claimed by China, Taiwan, and the Philippines, and the US has maintained that any attempts to militarize the shoal would cross a “red line.”

According to Pentagon officials, Beijing may have just crossed it.

While China has maintained a small presence of two or three maritime security vessels around Scarborough Shoal, that number has escalated in the last few weeks. US officials familiar with intelligence reports tell the Washington Free Beacon that there are now over a dozen Chinese ships in the area.

In addition to security vessels, Beijing will also permit hundreds of fishing vessels to harvest the rich waters around Scarborough Shoal. This tactic was similarly deployed in the East China Sea, where Beijing sought to legitimize its claim to the Senkakus, islands claimed by both China (where they are known as the Diaoyus) and Japan.

In March, US President Barack Obama met with Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping, issuing a stern warning against the militarization of Scarborough Shoal, given its strategic proximity to the Philippines.

“The signaling from the US side was that this was serious,” a former US official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told the Financial Times.

China’s apparent decision to flout that warning is likely related to last month’s ruling by the Hague-based Court of Arbitration. That decision sided against China’s nine-dash territorial claims in the South China Sea, a ruling that Beijing does not recognize as legitimate.

In the wake of the ruling, both the US and China have stepped up combat patrols in the region.

Earlier this week, satellite images revealed that China is building up its military presence in the Spratly archipelago as well, with new aircraft hangars at Fiery Cross, Subi, and Mischief Reefs.

A highly-disputed waterway through which $5 trillion in international trade passes annually, most of the South China Sea is claimed by China, though there are overlapping claims by Taiwan, the Philippines, Brunei, Malaysia, and Vietnam.

Read More @

Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.

3 comments to Beijing Crosses Washington’s ‘Red Line’ in South China Sea

  • Daniel

    What’s Obozo going to do to the Chinese? Hit them with his purse? Show them the
    veins in his stack of dimes neck? Konk em over the head with a golf ball? Obozo
    and his cronies just need to have a time out and STFU until his sorry @ss is out
    of here in 5 months before he gets us all killed.

  • Millicent

    The last thing the US Military wants is to go toe to toe with and adversary that has advanced weaponry… The people would find out real quick that they have been paying (wasting a lot of tax dollars) for a bunch of over-hyped crap weaponry…

    This is why they love drone warfare… It looks hi-tech, scares people and does not incur manpower losses. What they don’t want is a couple of hypersonic ship to ship missiles taking out one of their multi-gazillion dollar rustbucket aircraft carriers.

    This is why USArael hasn’t gone after Hezbollah since they got their asses kicked invading Lebanon. They found that the Hezbollah troops had sophisticated anti-tank weaponry that could penetrate the heaviest tank armor and send a small supersonic warhead ricocheting around the interior of the tank, taking out the crew.

    Now they find that the Russians have electronic cloaking devices that make their ECM’s obsolete… If there is another big war it will be fought with ICBM’s while the pencil necks hide in their bunkers under DIA.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>