The Phaserl



from Only Prices Matter:

The last time we discussed gold on the site was a few weeks back in this post; therein we suggested a break-down in USDZAR was at hand and that should history hold, it would help propel and/or coincide with additional upside in the metal.

However, the above was merely a tactical, nearer-term call.

Strategically, it’s been even longer since we updated our longer-term framework for gold.  In fact, it’s been three months since we did that in this post.  In that May piece we suggested the metal continued to track favorably vs. our bullish expectations, but in the near-term it faced a major test having rallied nearly +25% off its Dec-15 low, a historical demarcation point whereby cyclical retracement rallies were either snuffed out with a resumption of a secular bear beginning afresh, or, the same moves continued higher, indicative of a new secular bull being underway.

Where do we now stand vs. that +25% demarcation point?

As of month-end today, gold is up over 27% from its Dec-15 lows.

This a major milestone – any time gold has managed a move of at least 25% off a major low, it has continued higher every single time with incremental gains ranging from 21%-412%, with the average totaling 175%.

In the chart below I’ve used the vertical, dotted green lines to show any month where gold closed at least 25% off a major low for the first time; the bright green annotations show the incremental upside for the metal until another major peak was put in place following these signals; the red annotations show that gold’s two major head-fake rallies off noteworthy lows – those being the 1993 and initial 1999 lows – never managed to get to +25% off those lows, stalling out just below +24% and +17%, respectively.

2016-07-29 Gold - Rallies of at Least 25 Percent off a Major Low - Monthly

In terms of the type of incremental upside scenarios for gold that the chart above outlines, keep in mind the analog I put up in my last and aforementioned gold update post.  That analog showed that vs. history’s other major bubbles (i.e., gold-80; Nikkei-89, NDX-00, Housing-05, etc.), gold’s to-date selling off its 2011 highs had been the strongest move in history at every single post-high weekly trading juncture, looking nothing like the material weakness witnessed in the others coming off their respective highs.  Its rally since bottoming in Dec-15 has only reinforced its differences vs. the others.

Using this comparison, one is left with the fairly ineluctable conclusion that if gold was a “bubble” from 2000 onward as most have claimed, it certainly doesn’t look like its high has yet to be registered.  In that regard, if gold has rallied anywhere from 21%-412% after closing at least +25% off a major low on a monthly basis as it’s doing in July, I am much more inclined to believe that one’s expectation for incremental upside this time around should skew larger, not smaller, as its 2011 highs are a mere ~10% away.

Here’s what the analog looks like now:

2016-07-29 Post Bubble Analog - Gold - Weekly

As the above occur, the metal is getting ever closer to the $1,375-$1,450 target I suggested it could reach by the second week of August in this post from March, which was an update to an analysis we initially presented in in this February post.

That initial post noted that in rallying ~550 bps in a week where the overall CRB index fell more than 100 bps during the second week of February, gold had registered what amounted to a 99.8th percentile out-performance event that had been replicated only five previous times.  It went on to show that the few times such wide weekly performance disparities have occurred historically, they effectively always led to material upside in the metal over all forward time-frames.

Read More @

Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.


Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>