The Phaserl


Obama’s Shameful Pivot to Gun Control After Orlando Terrorist Attack

by Penny Starr, CNS News:

It’s not surprising that, after the first responders, the first response to the horrific attack that killed 50 or more people at gay nightclub Pulse in Orlando was a sometimes vicious debate.

The instant anger to President Barack Obama’s statement about the attack reflects a deep and growing distrust over how this administration responds to the threat of global terrorism.

This POTUS never fails to move the bar for leadership lower: “Obama uses Orlando attack to call for gun control”

— Dan Bongino (@dbongino) June 12, 2016

Obama calls for gun control, but refuses to mention Islamic terrorism

— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) June 12, 2016

In his remarks, Obama was quick to renew the call for more gun control legislation and restrictions, saying:

“The shooter was apparently armed with a handgun and a powerful assault rifle. This massacre is therefore a further reminder of how easy it is for someone to get their hands on a weapon that lets them shoot people in a school, or in a house of worship, or a movie theater, or in a nightclub. And we have to decide if that’s the kind of country we want to be.”

That strikes of opportunism: using an act of terror to press a political agenda.

Read More @ CNS

Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.

1 comment to Obama’s Shameful Pivot to Gun Control After Orlando Terrorist Attack

  • d

    Do you think that many see the problem is the President and Hillary siding with the ..Radical Islamic Terrorist…as they refuse to acknowledge their existence….AND continue on against the ability of the law abiding American citizen to own a weapon EQUAL to what is availible to the military…. ……If you understand the english language then “The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence” and limited the applicability of the Second Amendment to the federal government.[9] In United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government and the states could limit any weapon types not having a “reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia.”[10][11]….So a semi auto matic rifle or hand gun IS proper for the military and also for citizens as THEY are the militia..YES even today…no matter what the lying politicians tell you…imho

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>