The Phaserl


Central Banks To Issue Digital Currencies? – Paul-Martin Foss

from The News Doctors:

Central bankers may have driven numerous economies into ruin. They may continue to drive up the cost of living and contribute to economic inequality. But rest assured, they are learning from their mistakes and vow to do everything they can to correct them. To that end, central bankers are looking into issuing their own digital currencies. Bitcoin, Litecoin, Dogecoin – why leave money to the marketplace when you can own and use digital currencies backed by the full faith and credit of the central government? Raise your hands if you’re a Bitcoin fan who wants to jump on the central bank digital currency bandwagon! No hands? Why not?

One of the central ideas behind the development of Bitcoin was to break the monopoly of central issuance of currency.

Yes, Bitcoin also has many benefits as a payment system and makes it easier to transfer value between and among individuals than through the banking system, but it was primarily designed to overcome the problem that central issuers of currency tend to abuse their money-creating privileges to the benefit of themselves and their cronies. Just look at the Federal Reserve System, which has increased the money supplytremendously under its watch, enriching Wall Street and impoverishing Main Street. Bitcoin, on the other hand, is limited to 21 million bitcoins. Once the total supply is mined, no more can be created. There is no central authority that can create more currency ad infinitum. That kind of stability is attractive to people who are tired of seeing the purchasing power of their money decreasing day by day due to central bank monetary policy.

The fact that central banks are even discussing issuing their own Bitcoin-like digital currencies shows how out of the loop they are. They are treating Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies as a fad that they have to come to grips with. Digital currencies are gaining a foothold not because they are a new-fangled fad or convenient to use, but because they are more trusted than currencies issued by central banks. If the Federal Reserve were to create “FedCoin”, it would never gain any traction in markets against Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies. It would be a joke. The only way it would be able to compete is the same way that central bank-issued currencies always have competed – by raising legal barriers to drive out their competition.

Read More

Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.

5 comments to Central Banks To Issue Digital Currencies? – Paul-Martin Foss

  • Deforest

    What is the bitcoin made of? Brass. The dollar? Paper. Crypto currencies? Algorithms? Honestly, is it where we are heading? Why not Monopoly money after all since its value is intrinsic to our confidence? Who will assure me that no abuse will be made? Isn’t it an open door to abuses? When metallic coins may have more value because it is a finite resource, what must I think of crypto currencies? In what way can’t we create bit coins ad infinitum? In what way an institution similar can’t take control of the new currency and manipulate it?
    Where’s the point of replacing a currency with no value with another that is not better? No dollar, no bitcoin for me?

  • KRELL427

    One step closer to a microchip in your hand.

  • tomche

    …Or a digital, water-proof, tamper-proof, non-removable bracelet around your wrist. Darpa already has a working prototype…

  • tomche

    I recently got rid of all my digital audio equipment and replaced it all with analog stuff. Not only does it sound better, but I am 1 step closer to removing myself from the cage that is digital.
    And it is (FOR SURE) a very carefully constructed, evil and progressively deadly cage at that…

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>