The Phaserl


Guess How Many Nations In The World Do Not Have A Central Bank?

by Michael Snyder, The Economic Collapse Blog:

Central banking has truly taken over the entire planet.  At this point, the only major nation on the globe that does not have a central bank is North Korea.  Yes, there are some small island countries such as the Federated States of Micronesia that do not have a central bank, but even if you count them, more than 99.9% of the population of the world still lives in a country that has a central bank.  So how has this happened?  How have we gotten the entire planet to agree that central banking is the best system?  Did the people of the world willingly choose this?  Of course not.  To my knowledge, there has never been a single vote where the people of a nation have willingly chosen to establish a central bank.  Instead, what has happened is that central banks have been imposed on all of us.  All over the world, people have been told that monetary issues are “too important” to be subject to politics, and that the only solution is to have a group of unelected, unaccountable bankers control those things for us.

So precisely what does a central bank do?

You would be surprised at how few people can actually answer that question accurately.  The following is how Wikipedia describes what a central bank does…

A central bank, reserve bank, or monetary authority is an institution that manages a state’s currency, money supply, and interest rates. Central banks also usually oversee the commercial banking system of their respective countries. In contrast to a commercial bank, a central bank possesses a monopoly on increasing the monetary base in the state, and usually also prints the national currency, which usually serves as the state’s legal tender. Examples include the European Central Bank (ECB), the Bank of England, the Federal Reserve of the United States and the People’s Bank of China.

In the United States, we are told that we have a free market system.  But in a true free market system, market forces would determine what interest rates are.  We wouldn’t need anyone to “set interest rates” for us.

And why have we given a private banking cartel (the Federal Reserve) the authority to create and manage our money supply?  The U.S. Constitution specifically delegates that authority to Congress.

It is not as if we actually need the Federal Reserve.  In fact, the greatest period of economic growth in U.S. history happened during the decades before the Federal Reserve was created.

Unfortunately, a little over 100 years ago our leaders decided that it would be best to turn over our financial future to a newly created private banking cartel that was designed by very powerful Wall Street interests.  Since that time, the value of our currency has diminished by more than 96 percent and our national debt has gotten more than 5000 times larger.

But despite all of the problems, the vast majority of Democrats and the vast majority of Republicans are not even willing to consider slightly curtailing the immense power of the Federal Reserve.  And the idea of getting rid of the Fed altogether is tantamount to blasphemy to most of our politicians.

Read More @

Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.

5 comments to Guess How Many Nations In The World Do Not Have A Central Bank?

  • Robert

    I don’t think Panama has a central bank.

  • Ed_B

    “All over the world, people have been told that monetary issues are “too important” to be subject to politics, and that the only solution is to have a group of unelected, unaccountable bankers control those things for us.”

    Considering all the financial crap that has hit the fan over the past dozen or so years, how’s this workin’ out for us? Does the phrase “not worth a s**t” come to mind?

    • Eric


      The sad part is that it’s about to really hit their pocketbook and the sheep will beg the government to solve their problems in the form of “give us free stuff. we deserve it. Never questioning their slavery.”

  • nano

    The article starts well then runs into a ditch.

    Face it, there were significant problems before the Fed.
    Yes, there is a good argument to be had in stating that the big banks in the 1800’s were a major source of those problems, nevertheless, don’t present the 1800’s as this Eden. To do that is to hurt your credibility.
    As we now known, trust is everything.

    In the 1800’s there was raw land & resources to be had.
    Physical growth covered up many corruption issues: local,state,Federal & banking.
    One could always move west to escape.
    These days there is no where left to run so as to escape the bankers.
    We’ve run out of room.
    Prison Planet.

    Focus instead on the cronyism of the Fed.
    That’s its Achilles heel. The Fed serves the oligarchs.

    • anon

      Too bad more Americans don’t really know the ECONOMIC history of the United States. They (most of them) probably don’t know about the first or second “Bank of the United States”, let alone the history behind the so-called “Federal” “Reserve” Act (Dec. 23, 1913). Yes, it’s important for those “in-the-know” to attempt to educate others about the “Fed”, as it DOES serve the “Oligarchs” of the West, and is CENTRAL to many and various problems that are facing this country. It is the “Fed” that lends fiat currency
      to the U.S. government – AT INTEREST – yet, the “Fed” does NOT print up the additional currency to cover said interest, and it’s the “Fed” (JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, etc.) that is funding all the greed, fraud, corruption and crony capitalism (or “crapitalism” also called corporatism, or FASCISM) on Wall St., and in the District of Criminals (D.C.), who ENABLE the fraud, corruption, and crapitalism on Wall St.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>